Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Ramada Inns, Inc. v. Lane and Bird Advertising, Inc., 426 P.2d 395.

40 citing documents.

Britt v. Advanced Business Services Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Britt v. Advanced Business Services Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
See Ramada Inns, Inc. v. Lane & Bird Advert., Inc.
Brown v. Hope Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Brown v. Hope Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Ramada Inns, Inc. v. Lane & Bird Advert., Inc.
Tailwind v. Wells Fargo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Tailwind v. Wells Fargo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
“The standard to be met in setting aside a default judgment, for mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect, is whether the conduct causing the default might be the act of a reasonably prudent person under the same circumstances.” Ramada Inns, Inc. v. Lane & Bird Advert., Inc.
Gateway v. Millennium Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Gateway v. Millennium Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
As a corporate entity, Millennium had to act through counsel, Ramada Inns, Inc. v. Lane & Bird Advert., Inc., (“A corporation cannot appear in court by an officer who is not an attorney, and it cannot appear in propria persona.”), and without counsel, it could not sign the joint application/report required by Rule 38.1(d)(2)(A).
Wells Fargo v. Safe Wing Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Wells Fargo v. Safe Wing Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶9 Safe Wing also cites Ramada Inns, Inc. v. Lane & Bird Advertising, Inc.
Glenn H/sonia H v. Hon hoskins/banner 419 P.3d 567 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Glenn H/sonia H v. Hon hoskins/banner 419 P.3d 567 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Until a corporation appears in court by counsel, its appearance is defective.” ¶ 12 (App. 2010) (citing Ramada Inns, Inc. v. Lane & Bird Advert., Inc., and then Boydston v. Strole Dev.
Eden v. Show Low Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Eden v. Show Low Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
See Haberkorn v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., (holding person not admitted to practice law in Arizona may not represent another individual); Ramada Inns, Inc. v. Lane & Bird Adver., Inc., (same for representation of companies).
Munger Chadwick, P.L.C. v. Farwest Development & Construction of the Southwest, LLC 329 P.3d 229 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Munger Chadwick, P.L.C. v. Farwest Development & Construction of the Southwest, LLC 329 P.3d 229 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
See Ramada Inns, Inc. v. Lane & Bird Adver., Inc., Anamax Mining Co. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
Smith v. Pinnamaneni 254 P.3d 409 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Smith v. Pinnamaneni 254 P.3d 409 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
See Ramada Inns, Inc. v. Lane & Bird Adver., Inc., , ("a corporation ...
State v. Eazy Bail Bonds 229 P.3d 239 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
State v. Eazy Bail Bonds 229 P.3d 239 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Ramada Inns, Inc. v. Lane & Bird Adver., Inc.
Boydston v. Strole Development Co. 969 P.2d 653 Ariz. 1998
Boydston v. Strole Development Co. 969 P.2d 653 Ariz. 1998
The court also acknowledged that we so held in Ramada Inns, Inc. v. Lane & Bird Advertising, Inc.
Boydston v. Strole Development Co. 962 P.2d 209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Boydston v. Strole Development Co. 962 P.2d 209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
(even if the parties do not raise the issue, the court must determine whether it has jurisdiction); Ramada Inns, Inc. v. Lane and Bird Adver., Inc., , (a corporation cannot appear in court by an officer who is not an attorney and cannot appear in propria persona).
Mohr, Hackett, Pederson, Blakley, Randolph & Haga, P.C. v. Superior Court 745 P.2d 208 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Mohr, Hackett, Pederson, Blakley, Randolph & Haga, P.C. v. Superior Court 745 P.2d 208 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Ramada Inns, Inc. v. Lane & Bird Advertising, Inc.
Hunt Investment Co. v. Eliot 742 P.2d 858 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Hunt Investment Co. v. Eliot 742 P.2d 858 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Ramada Inns, Inc. v. Lane and Bird Advertising, Inc., , Anamax Mining *363
Anamax Mining Co. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 711 P.2d 621 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Anamax Mining Co. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 711 P.2d 621 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
See, e.g., Ramada Inns, Inc. v. Lane & Bird Advertising, Inc.
Itt Courier v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 687 P.2d 365 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Itt Courier v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 687 P.2d 365 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
In so ruling the judge relied on Ramada Inns, Inc. v. Lane & Bird Advertising, Inc., , in which the supreme court said: A corporation cannot appear in court by an officer who is not an attorney, and it cannot appear in propria persona.
Campbell v. Frazer Construction Co. 451 P.2d 620 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Campbell v. Frazer Construction Co. 451 P.2d 620 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
It is the established law of this state that default judgments are not favored, Ramada Inns, Inc. v. Lane and Bird Advertising, Inc., , and, if there is “any doubt” as to whether a default should be set aside, it must be resolved in favor of the application
Del Castillo v. Harbour 445 P.2d 181 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
Del Castillo v. Harbour 445 P.2d 181 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
See, e. g., Ramada Inns, Inc. v. Lane and Bird Advertising, Inc.
First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Fogel 429 P.2d 11 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Fogel 429 P.2d 11 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
508 , Ramada Inns, Inc. v. Lane and Bird Advertising, Inc., , , 12 April 1967.
Dart v. Valley National Bank 427 P.2d 346 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Dart v. Valley National Bank 427 P.2d 346 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
508 , Ramada Inns, Inc. v. Lane and Bird Advertising, Inc., , , 12 April 1967.