Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. Little, 443 P.2d 690.

64 citing documents.

Joseph, Md v. Markovitz, Md 551 P.2d 571 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Joseph, Md v. Markovitz, Md 551 P.2d 571 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
General Accident Fire &amp
Fulton v. Woodford 545 P.2d 979 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Fulton v. Woodford 545 P.2d 979 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
by making the objective test to be: “When an insurance company evaluates a claim without looking to the policy limits and as though it alone would be responsible for the payment of any judgment rendered on that claim it views that claim objectively, and in doing so renders ‘equal consideration’ t
State Farm Auto. Ins. Co. v. CIVIL SERV. EMP. INS. 509 P.2d 725 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
State Farm Automobile Insurance v. Civil Service Employees Insurance 509 P.2d 725 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
State Farm Auto. Ins. Co. v. CIVIL SERV. EMP. INS. 509 P.2d 725 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Later, in General Accident Fire & , the equality of consideration test was again approved by the Arizona Supreme Court as the correct test to determine an insurer's possible liability in excess of policy limits for breach of its obligation to settle, as follows: "...
State Farm Automobile Insurance v. Civil Service Employees Insurance 509 P.2d 725 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Later, in General Accident Fire & , the equality of consideration test was again approved by the Arizona Supreme Court as the correct test to determine an insurer’s possible liability in excess of policy limits for breach of its obligation to settle, as follows: “.
Travelers Indemnity Company v. Hudson 488 P.2d 1008 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Travelers Indemnity Company v. Hudson 488 P.2d 1008 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Cagle v. Home Insurance Co. 483 P.2d 592 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Cagle v. Home Insurance Co. 483 P.2d 592 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
General Accident Fire &amp
First Security Bank v. Fireman's Fund Insurance 472 P.2d 87 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
First Security Bank v. Fireman's Fund Insurance 472 P.2d 87 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
General Accident Fire & , at 693 (1968), states: “It has long been the law in Arizona, and the law in most if not all jurisdictions that an assignee of a chose in action may maintain suit thereon in his own name * * *.” In a case similar to the one before us, the Colorado Supreme Court held that a judgment creditor of an insured