Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Rutledge v. State, 412 P.2d 467.
- JANE HM DOE v. THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH OF THE DIOCESE OF PHOENIX Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2023
-
JANE HM DOE v. THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH OF THE DIOCESE OF PHOENIX
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2023
(“The legislature may impose a reasonable time within which an action must be brought to recover damages recoverable under a constitutional provision.”).
- A Tumbling-T Ranches v. Flood Control District 217 P.3d 1220 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
-
A Tumbling-T Ranches v. Flood Control District
217 P.3d 1220
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
See, , (holding damages incidental to the building of a highway were barred by a two-year statute of limitation and stating there can be no constitutional taking or damaging without a physical invasion).
- Bertleson v. Sacks Tierney, P.A. 60 P.3d 703 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
-
Bertleson v. Sacks Tierney, P.A.
60 P.3d 703
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
-72 (1966) (rejecting a constitutional challenge to a statute of limitations).
- Flood Control Dist. v. Gaines 43 P.3d 196 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
-
Flood Control Dist. v. Gaines
43 P.3d 196
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Rutledge filed a complaint in inverse eminent domain more than two years after the state completed construction of a portion of a controlled-access freeway that restricted access to his land.
- AA MECHANICAL v. Superior Court 948 P.2d 492 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
- RANCH 57 v. City of Yuma 731 P.2d 113 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
-
RANCH 57 v. City of Yuma
731 P.2d 113
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
under a constitutional provision.”
- Barrio v. San Manuel Division Hospital for Magma Copper Co. 692 P.2d 280 Ariz. 1984
-
Barrio v. San Manuel Division Hospital for Magma Copper Co.
692 P.2d 280
Ariz. 1984
' Kenyon, supra, 142 Ariz. at 87 , 688 P.2d at 979
- Landgraff v. Wagner 546 P.2d 26 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
- Landgraff v. Wagner 546 P.2d 26 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
- State v. Crawford 475 P.2d 515 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
- State v. Crawford 475 P.2d 515 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
- Olson v. State 467 P.2d 945 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
-
Olson v. State
467 P.2d 945
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
Willey, , , City of Phoenix v. Wade, 5 Ariz.App.
- City of Tucson v. Melnykovich 457 P.2d 307 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
- Overruled City of Tucson v. Melnykovich 457 P.2d 307 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
- Uvodich v. Arizona Board of Regents 453 P.2d 229 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
-
Uvodich v. Arizona Board of Regents
453 P.2d 229
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Kansas City v. Berkshire Lumber Company, 393 S.W.2d 470 (Mo.1965); Wolf v. Commonwealth, 422 Pa.
- State Ex Rel. Herman v. Jacobs 440 P.2d 32 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
-
State Ex Rel. Herman v. Jacobs
440 P.2d 32
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
In support of this contention