Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Coury Bros. Ranches, Inc. v. Ellsworth, 446 P.2d 458.
- Matthew Cavallo v. Phoenix Health Plans Inc Ariz. 2022
-
Matthew Cavallo v. Phoenix Health Plans Inc
Ariz. 2022
(describing a “duty upon the person injured to exercise reasonable care to mitigate the injury, according to the opportunities that may fairly be or appear to be within his reach” (quoting 17 C.J. 844, § 166)); see also Coury Bros. Ranches, (explaining that “[t]he obligation to avoid the consequences of known injuries was recognized” in S.A.
- Aow v. Scythian Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
-
Aow v. Scythian
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Corp., (affirming summary judgment where "the damages sought in this suit do not have the requisite certainty of existence in order to allow their recovery"); see also Coury Bros. Ranches, (stating "[d]amages that are speculative, remote or uncertain may not form the basis of a judgment"); -37 (1963) (recognizing a plaintiff must "supply some reasonable basis for computing the amount of damage and must do so with such precision as, from the nature of his clai
- Brimley v. Jirauch Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- Brimley v. Jirauch Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- 10k LLC v. Wvsv Holdings Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
10k LLC v. Wvsv Holdings
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
“Damages that are speculative, remote or uncertain may not form the basis of a judgment.” Coury Bros. Ranches
- Smartcomm v. Palmieri Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
Smartcomm v. Palmieri
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
(“Damages that are speculative, remote or uncertain may not form the basis of a judgment.”).
- Greenwood v. Block Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
-
Greenwood v. Block
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
6 GREENWOOD v. BLOCK Decision of the Court Ariz. 515, 521, (“Damages that are speculative, remote or uncertain may not form the basis of a judgment.”); (stating that speculation is not competent evidence).
- Madison v. Chicago Title Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
Madison v. Chicago Title
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Coury Bros. Ranches, (citing Goodman v. Newzona Inv.
- Wilson v. Pnc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
Wilson v. Pnc
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
See Coury Bros. Ranches, (“Proof of the fact of damages must be of a higher order than proof of the amount of damages.”); (“conjecture or speculation cannot provide the basis for an award of damages”).
- Butler v. Dyer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- Butler v. Dyer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- Felder v. Physiotherapy Associates 158 P.3d 877 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
-
Felder v. Physiotherapy Associates
158 P.3d 877
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Id.; see also Coury Bros. Ranches, -21 , -64 (1968) (finding evidence failed to show that breach of contract caused losses).
- Wolfinger v. Cheche 80 P.3d 783 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
- Wolfinger v. Cheche 80 P.3d 783 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
- West Pinal Family Health Center, Inc. v. McBryde 785 P.2d 66 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
-
West Pinal Family Health Center, Inc. v. McBryde
785 P.2d 66
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
C. McCormick, Damages at 127 (1935); see also Coury Bros. Ranches, , Barnes v. Lopez, 25 Ariz.App.
- Warfel v. Cheney 758 P.2d 1326 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
-
Warfel v. Cheney
758 P.2d 1326
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
See Coury Bros. Ranches, , see also Dean v. Holland, 350 N.Y.S.2d at 861-62 .
- Lewin v. Miller Wagner & Co., Ltd. 725 P.2d 736 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
- Lewin v. Miller Wagner & Co., Ltd. 725 P.2d 736 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
- New Pueblo Constructors, Inc. v. State 696 P.2d 185 Ariz. 1985
-
New Pueblo Constructors, Inc. v. State
696 P.2d 185
Ariz. 1985
§ 12-341.01 are not “costs” within the meaning of civil rule 67(d) requiring security for costs); , (“The words ‘legal costs’ in a contract mean such costs as are usually recovered in civil actions and does not include attorney’s fees.”).
- Farr v. Transamerica Occidental Life Insurance 699 P.2d 376 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
- Farr v. Transamerica Occidental Life Insurance 699 P.2d 376 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
- Northern Arizona Gas Service, Inc. v. Petrolane Transport, Inc. 702 P.2d 696 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
-
Northern Arizona Gas Service, Inc. v. Petrolane Transport, Inc.
702 P.2d 696
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Coury Bros. Ranches, , Fairway Builders, Inc. v. Malouf Towers Rental Co., Inc., , Barnes v. Lopez, 25 Ariz.App.
- DVM CO. v. Stag Tobacconist, Ltd. 671 P.2d 907 Ariz. 1983
- DVM CO. v. Stag Tobacconist, Ltd. 671 P.2d 907 Ariz. 1983
- University of Arizona Health Sciences Center v. Superior Court 667 P.2d 1294 Ariz. 1983
-
University of Arizona Health Sciences Center v. Superior Court
667 P.2d 1294
Ariz. 1983
Compare Coury Bros. Ranches
- Amfac Distribution Corp. v. Miller 673 P.2d 795 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
-
Amfac Distribution Corp. v. Miller
673 P.2d 795
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
“Damages that are speculative, remote or uncertain may not form the basis of a judgment.” Coury Bros. Ranches
- Lininger v. Dine Out Corp. 639 P.2d 350 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
- Lininger v. Dine Out Corp. 639 P.2d 350 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
- Fairway Builders, Inc. v. Malouf Towers Rental Co. 603 P.2d 513 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
- Fairway Builders, Inc. v. Malouf Towers Rental Co. 603 P.2d 513 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
- Circle K Corp. v. Rosenthal 574 P.2d 856 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
- Circle K Corp. v. Rosenthal 574 P.2d 856 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
- Fleitz v. Van Westrienen 560 P.2d 430 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
- Fleitz v. Van Westrienen 560 P.2d 430 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
- Hercules Drayage Co., Inc. v. Chanco Leasing Corp. 540 P.2d 724 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
- Hercules Drayage Co., Inc. v. Chanco Leasing Corp. 540 P.2d 724 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975