Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Shroyer v. Industrial Commission, 408 P.2d 406.

20 citing documents.

Raban v. Industrial Commission 541 P.2d 950 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Raban v. Industrial Commission 541 P.2d 950 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Turley v. Industrial Commission, 10 Ariz.App.
Favela v. Industrial Commission 490 P.2d 432 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Favela v. Industrial Commission 490 P.2d 432 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
In that case, with regard to loss of earning capacity, we stated: “While our Supreme Court has stated that the Commission may not base its loss of earning capacity on post-injury earnings alone, , it is also stated that post-injury earnings may raise a presumption of at least commensurate earning capacity.
Matson v. Industrial Commission 489 P.2d 858 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Matson v. Industrial Commission 489 P.2d 858 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
196 , but such evidence is not necessarily conclusive or controlling, , , , that the Commission may not base the earning capacity solely upon what a worker is receiving in his last employment when temporary.
Turley v. Industrial Commission 455 P.2d 470 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Turley v. Industrial Commission 455 P.2d 470 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Lutich v. Industrial Commission 446 P.2d 251 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
Lutich v. Industrial Commission 446 P.2d 251 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
The Supreme Court has said: “ * * * , we pointed out that ‘earning capacity’ of a disabled man is determined as of the time of the hearing and by considering petitioner’s average earnings along with all other evidence pertaining.
Laird v. Industrial Commission 445 P.2d 79 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
Soto v. City of Tucson 445 P.2d 82 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
Soto v. City of Tucson 445 P.2d 82 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
While it is true that post-injury earnings are not the sole basis for determining loss of earning capacity, , they nevertheless may raise a presumption of at least a commensurate earning capacity.
Laird v. Industrial Commission 445 P.2d 79 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
While our Supreme Court has stated that the Commission may not base its loss of earning capacity on post-injury earnings alone, , it is also stated that post-injury earnings may raise a presumption of at least commensurate earning capacity.
Maness v. Industrial Commission 434 P.2d 643 Ariz. 1967
Maness v. Industrial Commission 434 P.2d 643 Ariz. 1967
-(1965), we pointed out that “earning capacity” of a disabled man is determined as of the time of the hearing and by considering petitioner’s average earnings along with all other evidence pertaining to obtaining and holding employment similar to that in which the disabled person was doing before the in
Powell v. Industrial Commission 423 P.2d 348 Ariz. 1967
Powell v. Industrial Commission 423 P.2d 348 Ariz. 1967
Wollum v. Industrial Commission 414 P.2d 137 Ariz. 1966
Wollum v. Industrial Commission 414 P.2d 137 Ariz. 1966
rehearing denied , ; , .