Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Eaton Fruit Co. v. California Spray-Chemical Corp., 426 P.2d 397.
-
Campbell v. Frazer Construction Co.
451 P.2d 620
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
In the area of mistake or neglect, and this is the area •in which this case must fall, the law appears to be that the moving party must show that: “* * * the conduct causing the default might be the act of a reasonably prudent person under the same circumstances.” Ramada Inns, Inc. v. Lane and Bird Advertising, Inc., , .
- Heeter v. Moore Drug Co. 440 P.2d 680 Ariz. 1968
- Heeter v. Moore Drug Co. 440 P.2d 680 Ariz. 1968
- Ashley v. Kramer 442 P.2d 564 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
-
Ashley v. Kramer
442 P.2d 564
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
which opinion was rendered on 13 April 1967.
- Thomas v. Western Savings and Loan Association 433 P.2d 1003 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
- Distinguished Thomas v. Western Savings and Loan Association 433 P.2d 1003 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
- Boies v. Anderson 435 P.2d 70 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
-
Boies v. Anderson
435 P.2d 70
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
this appeal is suspended pending application by appellant in the Superior Court for a formal written order granting the writ of habeas corpus and ordering the release of the defendant.
- Haberkorn v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. 427 P.2d 378 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
-
Haberkorn v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
427 P.2d 378
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
On 13 April 1967, the Supreme Court decided the case of Eaton Fruit Company, , .
- Ulan v. Kay 427 P.2d 376 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
- Ulan v. Kay 427 P.2d 376 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967