Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Staley v. Estate of Harber, 449 P.2d 7.

56 citing documents.

Wick v. Wick 489 P.2d 19 Ariz. 1971
Wick v. Wick 489 P.2d 19 Ariz. 1971
n action for divorce the court will approve a valid separation and property settlement agreement and incorporate it into the divorce decree, provided the settlement is “free from any taint of fraud, coercion or undue influence * * * [the parties]' acted with full knowledge of the property involved and [their] rights therein, and that the settlement was fair and equitable.” at 88 , at 16 (1969); , 242 P. 337 (1926)
Marquess v. Spaner 488 P.2d 698 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Marquess v. Spaner 488 P.2d 698 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Arizona Commercial Mining Co., v. Iron Cap Copper Co., , 239 P. 290 (1925).
Wick v. Wick 481 P.2d 298 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Wick v. Wick 481 P.2d 298 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Further, *131 in , the holding of the court was that it would not enforce a post-nuptial (not in contemplation of divorce) property settlement agreement where the distribution of the property to the wife was not fair and equitable to her.