Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Watson v. Industrial Commission, 414 P.2d 144.

25 citing documents.

Mitchell v. Gamble, Jenson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Mitchell v. Gamble, Jenson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Comm’n, (“contract of hire” implies voluntary relation between the parties); Posey v. Indus.
City of South Tucson v. Industrial Commission 753 P.2d 1199 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
City of South Tucson v. Industrial Commission 753 P.2d 1199 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Compare Johnson v. Industrial Comm’n, , (distinguishing authority from jurisdiction with statutory exclusion, supreme court concluded that prisoner entitled to compensation because facts established contract for hire) with Watson v. Industrial Comm’n, , (in absence of constitutional or statutory provision concerning compensation of prisoners, supreme court concluded that claimant not entitled to compensation because no contract for hire).
State v. Valenzuela 695 P.2d 732 Ariz. 1985
State v. Valenzuela 695 P.2d 732 Ariz. 1985
Flamingo Motor Inn v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZ. 650 P.2d 502 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
State v. Barnard 612 P.2d 1073 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
State v. Barnard 612 P.2d 1073 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Continental Casualty Co. v. Industrial Commission 536 P.2d 210 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Continental Casualty Co. v. Industrial Commission 536 P.2d 210 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
The hearing officer reviewed the “claimant-prisoner” , , Vaughn v. Industrial Commission of Arizona, 13 Ariz.App.
Keeney v. Industrial Commission 535 P.2d 31 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Keeney v. Industrial Commission 535 P.2d 31 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
the Arizona Supreme Court held that a prison trusty who was injured while working on a farm outside the prison walls, and who had volunteered for the job and was receiving special treatment therefor, was not an employee and not entitled to workmen’s compensation.
State v. Rice 516 P.2d 1222 Ariz. 1973
State v. Rice 516 P.2d 1222 Ariz. 1973
Knack v. Industrial Commission 500 P.2d 1124 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Knack v. Industrial Commission 500 P.2d 1124 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Bearden v. Industrial Commission 483 P.2d 568 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Bearden v. Industrial Commission 483 P.2d 568 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
the claimant was serving time in the Arizona State Prison and therefore had been convicted of and sentenced for a felony.
Moore v. Maricopa County 466 P.2d 56 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Moore v. Maricopa County 466 P.2d 56 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Davis v. State ex rel. Eyman 429 P.2d 521 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Davis v. State ex rel. Eyman 429 P.2d 521 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Rogers v. State ex rel. Eyman 424 P.2d 199 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Rogers v. State ex rel. Eyman 424 P.2d 199 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
: “ * * * and every man who works, whether inside or outside, receives two days credit for one day’s work.