Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Arizona Podiatry Ass'n v. Director of Insurance, 422 P.2d 108.

100 citing documents.

City of Show Low v. Owens 619 P.2d 1043 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
City of Show Low v. Owens 619 P.2d 1043 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. J-84536-S 617 P.2d 54 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. J-84536-S 617 P.2d 54 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
“The right to appeal is one which must be provided either by the constitution or by the legislature.” Arizona Podiatry Ass’n v. Director of Insurance
In re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. Jt-180844 569 P.2d 301 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
In re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. Jt-180844 569 P.2d 301 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
§ 12-111; , In the Matter of the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-834, 26 Ariz.App.
In re the Appeal in Maricopa County 549 P.2d 580 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Matter of App. in Maricopa Cty., Juv. Act. 549 P.2d 580 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Matter of App. in Maricopa Cty., Juv. Act. 549 P.2d 580 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
In re the Appeal in Maricopa County 549 P.2d 580 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Landgraff v. Wagner 546 P.2d 26 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Landgraff v. Wagner 546 P.2d 26 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
State v. Bateman 540 P.2d 732 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
State v. Bateman 540 P.2d 732 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Co. v. Equitable Life Assurance Soc’y. of United States, , ; Arizona Podiatry Ass’
ANDREW BROWN COMPANY v. Painters Warehouse, Inc. 531 P.2d 527 Ariz. 1975
ANDREW BROWN COMPANY v. Painters Warehouse, Inc. 531 P.2d 527 Ariz. 1975
Jurisdiction of this case was taken by the Supreme Court pursuant to Arizona Podiatry Ass’n v. Director of Insurance
Hovatter v. Shell Oil Company 529 P.2d 224 Ariz. 1974
Hovatter v. Shell Oil Company 529 P.2d 224 Ariz. 1974
Maryland National Insurance v. Ozzie Young Drilling Co. 526 P.2d 402 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Maryland National Insurance v. Ozzie Young Drilling Co. 526 P.2d 402 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Arizona State Tax Commission v. Catalina Savings & Loan Ass'n 493 P.2d 944 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
Arizona State Tax Commission v. Catalina Savings & Loan Ass'n 493 P.2d 944 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
As the court stated in Arizona Podiatry Ass’n v. Director of Insurance, , “the supreme court was specifically given jurisdiction over all future rules or changes in the rules for judicial procedure.
Hawkinson Tire Co. v. Paul E. Hawkinson Co. 485 P.2d 825 Ariz. 1971
Hawkinson Tire Co. v. Paul E. Hawkinson Co. 485 P.2d 825 Ariz. 1971
Although the law is not clear as to the applicability of this statute to the matters of procedure before this court, Arizona Podiatry Ass’n v. Director of Insurance, , we feel that the statute merely codifies what has been the common law (§ 1-201 A.R.S.).
Goodrich v. Industrial Commission 463 P.2d 550 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Goodrich v. Industrial Commission 463 P.2d 550 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
and related cases discussed in Morrison, supra, at , .
State v. Blazak 462 P.2d 84 Ariz. 1969
State v. Blazak 462 P.2d 84 Ariz. 1969
v. Director of Insurance
Morrison v. Superior Court of Coconino County 461 P.2d 170 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Morrison v. Superior Court of Coconino County 461 P.2d 170 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Industrial Commission v. Harbor Ins.
State Ex Rel. De Concini v. Gatewood 458 P.2d 368 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
State Ex Rel. De Concini v. Gatewood 458 P.2d 368 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Lueck v. Superior Court in & for the County of Cochise 457 P.2d 348 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Lueck v. Superior Court in & for the County of Cochise 457 P.2d 348 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Arizona Podiatry Ass’n v. Director of Insurance
State v. Meek 445 P.2d 463 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
State v. Meek 445 P.2d 463 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
Vallentine v. Azar 445 P.2d 449 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
Vallentine v. Azar 445 P.2d 449 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
Arizona Podiatry Ass’n v. Director of Insurance
Shenfield v. City Court of City of Tucson, Pima County 443 P.2d 443 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
Shenfield v. City Court of City of Tucson, Pima County 443 P.2d 443 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
See, e.g., Arizona Podiatry Ass’n v. Director of Insurance, , , Searles v. Haldiman, 3 Ariz.App.
McKay v. Industrial Commission 433 P.2d 32 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
McKay v. Industrial Commission 433 P.2d 32 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
the Arizona Supreme Court held that in the matter of appeals from the Superior Court, there is concurrent appellate jurisdiction in the Arizona Supreme Court and in the Court of Appeals in those cases which are within the jurisdiction of the Court of Appeals.
J. H. Welsh & Son Contracting Co. v. Arizona State Tax Commission 432 P.2d 455 Ariz. 1967
J. H. Welsh & Son Contracting Co. v. Arizona State Tax Commission 432 P.2d 455 Ariz. 1967
Bowling v. State 424 P.2d 159 Ariz. 1967
Bowling v. State 424 P.2d 159 Ariz. 1967
of the State of Ariz. et al., , .
Smitherman v. Superior Court 424 P.2d 461 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Smitherman v. Superior Court 424 P.2d 461 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Arizona Podiatry Ass’n v. Director of Insurance
Industrial Commission v. Harbor Insurance Company 422 P.2d 694 Ariz. 1967
Industrial Commission v. Harbor Insurance Company 422 P.2d 694 Ariz. 1967
v. Director of Insurance, , (Dec.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by