Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Wollum v. Industrial Commission, 414 P.2d 137.

40 citing documents.

Funk v. Industrial Commission 808 P.2d 827 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Funk v. Industrial Commission 808 P.2d 827 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
See, e.g., Wol-lum v. Industrial Comm’n, -21 , ( , ).
Pullins v. Industrial Commission 645 P.2d 807 Ariz. 1982
Pullins v. Industrial Commission 645 P.2d 807 Ariz. 1982
we held that the previous non-industrially related amputation of the distal phalanx of the left index finger did not result in a loss of earning capacity.
Borsh v. Industrial Commission of Arizona 620 P.2d 218 Ariz. 1980
Borsh v. Industrial Commission of Arizona 620 P.2d 218 Ariz. 1980
overruled in part by Ronquillo v. Industrial Commission, supra.
Alsbrooks v. Industrial Commission 578 P.2d 159 Ariz. 1978
Alsbrooks v. Industrial Commission 578 P.2d 159 Ariz. 1978
Alsbrooks v. Industrial Commission 578 P.2d 184 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Alsbrooks v. Industrial Commission 578 P.2d 184 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Ross v. Industrial Commission, 22 Ariz.App.
Morgan v. Industrial Commission 521 P.2d 157 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Morgan v. Industrial Commission 521 P.2d 157 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
§ 23-1044(E) inapplicable); , (at the time of the injury to petitioner’s leg he was not suffering any loss of earning capacity due to the lack of a distal phalanx of his left index finger); , (petitioner had prior loss of leg before industrial accident).
Yount v. Industrial Commission 514 P.2d 280 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Yount v. Industrial Commission 514 P.2d 280 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
overruled in part in Ronquillo, supra
Stine v. Industrial Commission 513 P.2d 1348 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Overruled Stine v. Industrial Commission 513 P.2d 1348 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
In addition, , was cited as authority by the hearing officer but was overruled in Ronquillo, supra.
Bozman v. Industrial Commission 513 P.2d 679 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Bozman v. Industrial Commission 513 P.2d 679 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Hollywood Continental Films v. Industrial Commission 506 P.2d 274 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Hollywood Continental Films v. Industrial Commission 506 P.2d 274 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
C.) Testimony at this hearing, , centered primarily upon whether the presumption that the last scheduled injury should be treated as unscheduled was rebutted by evidence showing that no loss of earning capacity resulted from the prior industrially related scheduled injury.
Sutton v. Industrial Commission 493 P.2d 501 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Sutton v. Industrial Commission 493 P.2d 501 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Rodgers v. Industrial Commission 488 P.2d 685 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Rodgers v. Industrial Commission 488 P.2d 685 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Hurley v. Industrial Commission, 12 Ariz.App.
Duron v. Industrial Commission 491 P.2d 21 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Duron v. Industrial Commission 491 P.2d 21 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Ronquillo v. Industrial Commission 490 P.2d 423 Ariz. 1971
Ronquillo v. Industrial Commission 490 P.2d 423 Ariz. 1971
we discussed a situation wherein a workman had a previous non-industrial injury consisting of an amputation of the distal phalanx of his left index finger.
Ronquillo v. Industrial Commission 484 P.2d 652 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Ronquillo v. Industrial Commission 484 P.2d 652 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Peret v. Industrial Commission 474 P.2d 474 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Peret v. Industrial Commission 474 P.2d 474 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Hurley v. Industrial Commission 468 P.2d 613 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Hurley v. Industrial Commission 468 P.2d 613 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
(emphasis ours) And: “Therefore, the determination to be made by this court is whether there was sufficient evidence to reasonably support a finding by the Commission that the loss of the distal phalanx of his left index finger had not resulted in a loss of earning capacity disability existing at the time of injury.”
Merrill v. Industrial Commission 466 P.2d 783 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Merrill v. Industrial Commission 466 P.2d 783 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
in that the prior disability must be shown to have affected the earning capacity of the claimant at the time of the subsequent injury, which the claimant here, as in Wollum, was unable to do.
Leon v. Industrial Commission 459 P.2d 749 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Leon v. Industrial Commission 459 P.2d 749 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
The major Arizona cases for our consideration are: McKinney v. Industrial Commission, 7S Ariz. 264, , , and Edwards v. Industrial Commission, 3 Ariz.App.
Lamb v. Industrial Commission 448 P.2d 425 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
Lamb v. Industrial Commission 448 P.2d 425 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
as standing for a contrary proposition.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by