Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Tovrea v. Superior Court, 419 P.2d 79.

35 citing documents.

State of Arizona v. Dave Allen Laporte Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2026
e.g., Bogard v. Cannon & Wendt Elec.
In Re Herrera Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
In Re Herrera Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
¶17 Claudia argues that the court erred by awarding Ana $11,152 in attorneys’ fees that this Court denied in deciding Claudia’s appeal, and Scates v. Arizona Corp. Comm’n
Agricann v. Natural Remedy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Agricann v. Natural Remedy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Maricopa Cnty., ); ¶ 1 (App. 2011).
Hobson v. Chen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Hobson v. Chen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
12th Street v. Lynaugh Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
12th Street v. Lynaugh Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Thomas v. Montelucia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Thomas v. Montelucia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
it is not within the jurisdiction of the trial court to review the appellate court’s determination.”
Patrick Whillock v. State of Arizona 302 P.3d 664 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
Patrick Whillock v. State of Arizona 302 P.3d 664 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
Cal X-Tra v. W.V.S v. Holdings, L.L.C. 276 P.3d 11 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Cal X-Tra v. W.V.S v. Holdings, L.L.C. 276 P.3d 11 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Thus, “the trial court is absolutely bound by the decision and mandate of an appellate court and [ ] it is not within the jurisdiction of the trial court to review the appellate court’s determination.” , (citations omitted).
Minjares v. State 219 P.3d 264 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Minjares v. State 219 P.3d 264 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Bryfogle v. Arizona Department of Corrections 739 P.2d 819 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Bryfogle v. Arizona Department of Corrections 739 P.2d 819 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc. 673 P.2d 927 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc. 673 P.2d 927 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Jordan v. Jordan 643 P.2d 1008 Ariz. 1982
Jordan v. Jordan 643 P.2d 1008 Ariz. 1982
Zellerbach Paper Co. v. Valley National Bank, 18 Ariz.App
Jordan v. Jordan 643 P.2d 1021 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
Jordan v. Jordan 643 P.2d 1021 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
“To hold otherwise would be to strip judicial proceedings of their dignity and respect, while creating a circular process that would provide no end to litigation nor final determination of rights and obligations.”
Brant v. Hargrove 632 P.2d 978 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Brant v. Hargrove 632 P.2d 978 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Scates v. Arizona Corp. Commission 601 P.2d 1357 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Scates v. Arizona Corp. Commission 601 P.2d 1357 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Sepo v. Case 541 P.2d 1160 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Sepo v. Case 541 P.2d 1160 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
the Supreme Court, citing Art. VI, Sec.
O'Malley Investment and Realty Co. v. Trimble 427 P.2d 926 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
O'Malley Investment and Realty Co. v. Trimble 427 P.2d 926 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Industrial Commission v. Superior Court in and for County of Pima 423 P.2d 375 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Industrial Commission v. Superior Court in and for County of Pima 423 P.2d 375 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967