Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State Ex Rel. Smith v. Bohannan, 421 P.2d 877.

26 citing documents.

Estate of braden/gabaldon v. State 266 P.3d 349 Ariz. 2011
Estate of braden/gabaldon v. State 266 P.3d 349 Ariz. 2011
(finding no impermissible splitting of a cause of action in state's quo warranto action because the state is a separate legal entity that has power to sue).
Parkinson v. Guadalupe Public Safety Retirement Local Board 151 P.3d 557 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Parkinson v. Guadalupe Public Safety Retirement Local Board 151 P.3d 557 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
(We will not read into a statute a meaning that its language does not clearly intend.); , (We give statutes a sensible construction, one that advances their purpose and avoids an “absurd” result.).
State v. McKeon 38 P.3d 1236 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Jennings v. Woods 982 P.2d 274 Ariz. 1999
Jennings v. Woods 982 P.2d 274 Ariz. 1999
State v. Ritch 774 P.2d 234 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
State v. Ritch 774 P.2d 234 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
appeal dismissed, 389 U.S. 1 , 88 S.Ct.
Roberts v. City of Mesa 760 P.2d 1091 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Roberts v. City of Mesa 760 P.2d 1091 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
appeal dismissed 389 U.S. 1 , 88 S.Ct.
Willow Creek Leasing, Inc. v. Bartzen 742 P.2d 840 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Willow Creek Leasing, Inc. v. Bartzen 742 P.2d 840 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Carter-Glogau Laboratories, Inc. v. Construction, Production & Maintenance Laborers' Local 383 736 P.2d 1163 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Carter-Glogau Laboratories, Inc. v. Construction, Production & Maintenance Laborers' Local 383 736 P.2d 1163 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
appeal dismissed 389 U.S. 1 , 88 S.Ct.
Maucher v. City of Eloy 701 P.2d 593 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Maucher v. City of Eloy 701 P.2d 593 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
and Yetman v. Naumann, 16 Ariz.App.
Gosnell v. City of Phoenix 613 P.2d 281 Ariz. 1980
Gosnell v. City of Phoenix 613 P.2d 281 Ariz. 1980
Peterson v. Knutson 233 N.W.2d 716 Minn. 1975
State Ex Rel. Stowell v. Littrell 481 P.2d 889 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
State Ex Rel. Stowell v. Littrell 481 P.2d 889 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Johnson v. Collins 464 P.2d 647 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
Johnson v. Collins 464 P.2d 647 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
appeal dismissed 389 U.S. 1 , 88 S. Ct. 55 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1
Bushnell v. Superior Court of Maricopa County 428 P.2d 987 Ariz. 1967
Bushnell v. Superior Court of Maricopa County 428 P.2d 987 Ariz. 1967
and whereas a “reward” does of necessity result in a personal gain in some manner or another.