Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Neil, 425 P.2d 842.

70 citing documents.

State v. Myers 570 P.2d 1252 Ariz. 1977
State v. Myers 570 P.2d 1252 Ariz. 1977
State v. Harwood 519 P.2d 177 Ariz. 1974
State v. Harwood 519 P.2d 177 Ariz. 1974
Tyler v. Fred Harvey, Inc. 514 P.2d 268 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Tyler v. Fred Harvey, Inc. 514 P.2d 268 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
our Supreme Court, noting that the law pertaining to a change of judge was the same in criminal and civil cases, held that following a reversal of a case by the Supreme Court and a resulting new second trial, the filing of an affidavit of bias and prejudice was not timely to effect a change of ju
King v. SUPERIOR COURT, IN & FOR COUNTY OF MARICOPA 502 P.2d 529 Ariz. 1972
King v. SUPERIOR COURT, IN & FOR COUNTY OF MARICOPA 502 P.2d 529 Ariz. 1972
Hofstra v. Mahoney 499 P.2d 735 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Hofstra v. Mahoney 499 P.2d 735 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
4 It is also interesting to note that by the insertion of subsection 42(f) 1(E)
State v. Shahan 495 P.2d 1355 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
State v. Shahan 495 P.2d 1355 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
State v. Foggy 486 P.2d 789 Ariz. 1971
State v. Foggy 486 P.2d 789 Ariz. 1971
a somewhat similar contention was advanced by that defendant.
West v. Superior Court 448 P.2d 57 Ariz. 1968
West v. Superior Court 448 P.2d 57 Ariz. 1968
State v. Tatkenhorst 437 P.2d 948 Ariz. 1968
State v. Tatkenhorst 437 P.2d 948 Ariz. 1968
Hendrickson v. Superior Court, etc., , , 73 A.L.R.2d 1235 ; , .
State Ex Rel. Riley v. Collins 435 P.2d 871 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
State Ex Rel. Riley v. Collins 435 P.2d 871 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968