Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Superior Court in and for County of Pima, 430 P.2d 408.

25 citing documents.

Stromberg v. Heirigs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
at 650, ¶ 29; (“The lower courts of this state are bound by law to follow the rules promulgated by the Supreme Court.”) ¶54 The second reason is that the verdict rendered by the jury was simply beyond its power to order.
Aranzi Rae Jon Willis v. Hon. bernini/state 515 P.3d 142 Ariz. 2022
Aranzi Rae Jon Willis v. Hon. bernini/state 515 P.3d 142 Ariz. 2022
See State v. Superior Court (Collins), O’ (Zlaket, J., concurring) (“[T]he secret nature of the hearings, the absence of a judge, and the lack of an adversarial structure make these proceedings ripe for abuse, and warrant additional, not fewer, [procedural] precautions.”).
State v. Superior Court 751 P.2d 566 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
State v. Superior Court 751 P.2d 566 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
It is always possible that a defect in the grand jury proceedings will appear in the transcript, see, , rendering questioning of individual grand jury members unnecessary.
State v. Emery 642 P.2d 838 Ariz. 1982
State v. Emery 642 P.2d 838 Ariz. 1982
State v. Surety Insurance Co. of California 625 P.2d 347 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
State v. Surety Insurance Co. of California 625 P.2d 347 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
For this last proposition
State v. Hocker 556 P.2d 784 Ariz. 1976
State v. Hocker 556 P.2d 784 Ariz. 1976
State v. Jackson 519 P.2d 848 Ariz. 1974
State v. Jackson 519 P.2d 848 Ariz. 1974
In support of his position, , and refers us to Rule 82 of the 1956 Rules of Criminal Procedure, 17 A. R.S.
Hackin v. Pioneer Plumbing Supply Co. 457 P.2d 312 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Hackin v. Pioneer Plumbing Supply Co. 457 P.2d 312 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
562, 564 , vacated on other grounds, , that the Maricopa County Superior Court is surfeited with litigation, and that a change from a court trial to a jury trial interferes with efficient methods of trial scheduling.
State v. McCormick 448 P.2d 74 Ariz. 1968
State v. McCormick 448 P.2d 74 Ariz. 1968
State v. McCormick 442 P.2d 134 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
State v. McCormick 442 P.2d 134 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
the decision of our Supreme Court in State v. Superior Court, etc., , which sustained the action of the Pima County superior • court in discharging the Pima County grand jury because of a defect in its impanelment.
State v. Superior Court of Pima County 435 P.2d 485 Ariz. 1967
State v. Superior Court of Pima County 435 P.2d 485 Ariz. 1967
Corbin v. Broadman 433 P.2d 289 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Corbin v. Broadman 433 P.2d 289 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Our Supreme Court, in following this trend, , upheld a Superior Court ruling which quashed a grand jury Indictment on the basis that there was ground for a challenge to the panel.
State v. Ahee 431 P.2d 906 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
State v. Ahee 431 P.2d 906 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967