8947
Precedential
Processed
Stines v. Superior Court
Cited by
- Camelback Contractors, Inc. v. Industrial Commission 608 P.2d 782 Ariz. Ct. App. 1980
- Fleitz v. Van Westrienen 560 P.2d 430 Ariz. Ct. App. 1977
- City of Scottsdale v. Kokaska 495 P.2d 1327 Ariz. Ct. App. 1972
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Zimmerman v. Superior Court 402 P.2d 212
Opinion text
PER CURIAM. The petition for writ of mandamus is ordered denied. The asserted impeaching evidence having been deposited with the clerk of the court in compliance with Rule XVI(c) (1) (vii), Uniform Rules of Practice, as amended February 1st, 1967, 17 A.R. S., the trial judge should examine such evidence for the purpose of determining whether it is for impeachment purposes, in accordance with our decision in Zimmerman v. Superior Court in and for Maricopa County, 98 Ariz. 85 , 402 P.2d 212 .