Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Collins v. Industrial Commission, 433 P.2d 801.

30 citing documents.

Allen v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 733 P.2d 290 Ariz. 1987
Allen v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 733 P.2d 290 Ariz. 1987
Tn making an award the commission exercises a judicial function and it acquires no jurisdiction of a case until a formal application for compensation is filed with it.’ Collins v. Industrial Comm’n, , (citations omitted) (interpreting A.R.S.
Magma Copper Co. v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZONA 676 P.2d 1096 Ariz. 1983
Magma Copper Co. v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZONA 676 P.2d 1096 Ariz. 1983
holds that failure to report creates a jurisdictional defect which may not be waived.
Nelson v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 656 P.2d 1230 Ariz. 1982
Nelson v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 656 P.2d 1230 Ariz. 1982
Van Horn did not file because his employer had made repeated promises that he would “take care of everything.” The Commission dismissed the late claim for lack of jurisdiction
Sun Control Tile Co. v. Industrial Commission 571 P.2d 1064 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Sun Control Tile Co. v. Industrial Commission 571 P.2d 1064 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Van Horn v. Industrial Commission 523 P.2d 783 Ariz. 1974
Van Horn v. Industrial Commission 523 P.2d 783 Ariz. 1974
Freig v. Industrial Commission of Arizona, supra.
Priedigkeit v. Industrial Commission 514 P.2d 1045 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Priedigkeit v. Industrial Commission 514 P.2d 1045 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
4 Case law had developed two exceptions, neither of which is applicable here, 5 but in general *597 the Arizona decisions had developed a very-restrictive interpretation of the one year limitation provision, typified by the Arizona Supreme Court’s
Meeks v. Industrial Commission 497 P.2d 410 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Meeks v. Industrial Commission 497 P.2d 410 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Freig v. Industrial Commission 487 P.2d 408 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Distinguished Freig v. Industrial Commission 487 P.2d 408 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
in that the Collins case dealt with a situation where “the injured party has made no attempt to give the Commission jurisdiction within the period of limitations.
Troska v. Industrial Commission 484 P.2d 12 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Troska v. Industrial Commission 484 P.2d 12 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Bluma v. Industrial Commission, 7 Ariz.App.
McNatt v. Industrial Commission 474 P.2d 1010 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
McNatt v. Industrial Commission 474 P.2d 1010 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
that it was without jurisdiction to proceed further with respect to Case No. BD 57390 due to lack of a timely application for compensation.
Collins v. Industrial Commission 455 P.2d 963 Ariz. 1969
Collins v. Industrial Commission 455 P.2d 963 Ariz. 1969
Collins v. L. M. White Contracting Co. 449 P.2d 54 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Collins v. L. M. White Contracting Co. 449 P.2d 54 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
“In cause number 8985 PR the opinion of the Arizona Supreme Court in connection with the review of the above reported decision of the Court of Appeals was entered on 15 November 1967 and is found in , 433 Pac.2d 801 .
Bluma v. Industrial Commission 439 P.2d 521 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
Bluma v. Industrial Commission 439 P.2d 521 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
that the one year provision is jurisdictional.
INT'L METAL PRODUCTS v. Industrial Com'n 436 P.2d 935 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
International Metal Products Division of McGraw Edison Co. v. Industrial Commission 436 P.2d 935 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
INT'L METAL PRODUCTS v. Industrial Com'n 436 P.2d 935 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
International Metal Products Division of McGraw Edison Co. v. Industrial Commission 436 P.2d 935 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by