Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Maness v. Industrial Commission, 434 P.2d 643.

91 citing documents.

Ibarra v. Olive garden/lm Ins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Ibarra v. Olive garden/lm Ins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Patches v. Industrial Com'n of Ariz. 204 P.3d 437 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Patches v. Industrial Com'n of Ariz. 204 P.3d 437 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Comm’n, 102 * P.2d 643 (1967); Moore v. Indus.
Schuck & Sons Construction v. Industrial Commission 138 P.3d 1201 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Schuck & Sons Construction v. Industrial Commission 138 P.3d 1201 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
103 , ]; , Laird v. Industrial Commission, 8 Ariz.App.
Proudfoot v. Industrial Commission 971 P.2d 186 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Proudfoot v. Industrial Commission 971 P.2d 186 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Maness v. Industrial Comm’n, , County of Maricopa v. Industrial Comm’n
Rustin v. Industrial Commission 910 P.2d 627 Ariz. 1996
Rustin v. Industrial Commission 910 P.2d 627 Ariz. 1996
"Loss of earning capacity is determined as of the time of the hearing.” Arizona DPS, 176 Ariz. at 324 n. 4, 861 P.2d at 609 n. 4 ( , ).
Cohn v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 874 P.2d 315 Ariz. 1994
Cohn v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 874 P.2d 315 Ariz. 1994
See Maness v. Industrial Comm’n, , (“Post injury earnings may raise a presumption of at least commensurate earning capacity.”); Arizona DPS, 176 Ariz. at 323, 861 P.2d at 608 (presumption is rebuttable).
Fry's Food Stores v. Industrial Commission 866 P.2d 1350 Ariz. 1994
Fry's Food Stores v. Industrial Commission 866 P.2d 1350 Ariz. 1994
Arizona Department of Public Safety v. Industrial Commission 861 P.2d 603 Ariz. 1993
ARIZONA DPS v. Industrial Com'n 861 P.2d 603 Ariz. 1993
ARIZONA DPS v. Industrial Com'n 861 P.2d 603 Ariz. 1993
Although "[p]ost injury earnings may raise a presumption of at least commensurate earning capacity," , that presumption is rebuttable.
Arizona Department of Public Safety v. Industrial Commission 861 P.2d 603 Ariz. 1993
Although “[pjost injury earnings may raise a presumption of at least commensurate earning capacity,” , that presumption is rebuttable.
Cohn v. Industrial Commission 862 P.2d 881 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Cohn v. Industrial Commission 862 P.2d 881 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Maness v. Industrial Comm’n
County of Maricopa v. Industrial Commission of Arizona 699 P.2d 389 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
University Mechanical Contractors v. Industrial Commission 661 P.2d 215 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
University Mechanical Contractors v. Industrial Commission 661 P.2d 215 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Alsbrooks v. Industrial Commission 616 P.2d 929 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Alsbrooks v. Industrial Commission 616 P.2d 929 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Raban v. Industrial Commission, 25 Ariz.App.
Holder v. Industrial Commission of Arizona 609 P.2d 1066 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Holder v. Industrial Commission of Arizona 609 P.2d 1066 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
and thus prevent him and his dependents from becoming public charges.
Scott v. Industrial Commission 593 P.2d 919 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Scott v. Industrial Commission 593 P.2d 919 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Maness v. Industrial Comm’n
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Industrial Commission 573 P.2d 880 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Industrial Commission 573 P.2d 880 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Raban v. Industrial Commission 541 P.2d 950 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Raban v. Industrial Commission 541 P.2d 950 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Turley v. Industrial Commission, 10 Ariz.App.
Harbor Insurance Company v. Industrial Commission 537 P.2d 34 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Harbor Insurance Company v. Industrial Commission 537 P.2d 34 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
§ 23-1044F, as amended 1968; that again, historically and ‘pre-1969’ the Commission initially determined loss of earning capacity, and the amount of permanent compensation benefits due, and it was likewise solely the Commission’s duty and perrogative [sic] to rearrange and readjust on appropriate application therefor; , , that A. RS.
Springer v. Industrial Commission 533 P.2d 1166 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Dye v. Industrial Commission 530 P.2d 914 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Altamirano v. Industrial Commission 527 P.2d 1096 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Altamirano v. Industrial Commission 527 P.2d 1096 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Ross v. Industrial Commission 526 P.2d 416 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Continental Casualty Co. v. Industrial Commission 521 P.2d 1019 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Continental Casualty Co. v. Industrial Commission 521 P.2d 1019 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
The general rule is that evidence ' of post-injury earnings raises a presumption of at least commensurate earning capacity, , but such evidence is not necessarily controlling.
Ross v. Industrial Commission 526 P.2d 416 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
For somewhat analogous fact situations upholding a finding of no loss of earning capacity, , ; Turley v. Industrial Commission, 10 Ariz.App.
Bryant v. Industrial Commission 519 P.2d 209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Bryant v. Industrial Commission 519 P.2d 209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Cier v. Industrial Commission 517 P.2d 1076 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Cier v. Industrial Commission 517 P.2d 1076 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
However, petitioner’s argument is to the effect that notwithstanding the admitted increase in his post-injury earnings, and the principle that post-injury earnings' raise a presumption of commensurate post-injury earning capacity, , he still has incurred a loss in his earning capacity because of the pos *185 sibility of his inability in the future to obtain employment as a millwright foreman.
Stine v. Industrial Commission 513 P.2d 1348 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Stine v. Industrial Commission 513 P.2d 1348 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Turley v. Industrial Commission, 10 Ariz.App.
Travelers Insurance v. Industrial Commission 512 P.2d 875 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by