Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Berne v. Greyhound Parks of Arizona, Inc., 448 P.2d 388.
- Metcalf v. Montecito Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
Metcalf v. Montecito
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
But “[t]he proprietor of a business premises is not an insurer of the safety of invitees and is not required at his peril to keep the premises absolutely safe.” Berne v. Greyhound Parks of Ariz., Inc.
- Perez v. Circle K Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
-
Perez v. Circle K
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
See Berne v. Greyhound Parks of Ariz., Inc., (citing cases).
- Ager v. a Better Today Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
-
Ager v. a Better Today
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Berne v. Greyhound Parks of Ariz., Inc.
- Madison v. Chicago Title Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
Madison v. Chicago Title
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
See Berne v. Greyhound Parks of Ariz., Inc., (noting “universal rule” that plaintiff must establish breach of a duty to prevail on a claim of negligence); Rev. Ariz. Jury Instr.
- Steven H. Simon v. Safeway, Inc. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
-
Steven H. Simon v. Safeway, Inc.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
business premises is not an insurer of the safety of invitees and is not required at his peril to keep the premises absolutely safe,” Berne v. Greyhound Parks of Ariz., Inc., Martinez and Cotterhill do not, as Safeway suggests, conflict with that principle.
- Borota v. University Medical Center 861 P.2d 679 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
-
Borota v. University Medical Center
861 P.2d 679
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
Chiara v. Fry’s Food Stores of Arizona, Inc., , , Walker v. Montgomery Ward & Co., 20 Ariz.App.
- Chiara v. Fry's Food Stores of Arizona, Inc. 733 P.2d 283 Ariz. 1987
-
Chiara v. Fry's Food Stores of Arizona, Inc.
733 P.2d 283
Ariz. 1987
See Berne v. Greyhound Parks of Arizona, Inc.
- Smith v. Delvin 728 P.2d 1231 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
- Nicoletti v. Westcor, Inc. 639 P.2d 330 Ariz. 1982
- Nicoletti v. Westcor, Inc. 639 P.2d 330 Ariz. 1982
- Preuss v. Sambo's of Arizona, Inc. 635 P.2d 1210 Ariz. 1981
-
Preuss v. Sambo's of Arizona, Inc.
635 P.2d 1210
Ariz. 1981
Berne v. Greyhound Parks of Arizona, Inc.
- Bloom v. Fry's Food Stores, Inc. 636 P.2d 1229 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
-
Bloom v. Fry's Food Stores, Inc.
636 P.2d 1229
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
In doing so it distinguished the case of Berne v. Greyhound Parks of Arizona, Inc., , which is cited by appellee, on the basis that the particular dangerous condition involved there was not the necessary result of the defendant’s mode of operation.
- Tom v. SS Kresge Co., Inc. 633 P.2d 439 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
-
Tom v. SS Kresge Co., Inc.
633 P.2d 439
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
255 , Berne v. Greyhound Parks of Arizona, Inc.
- Flowers v. K-Mart Corp. 616 P.2d 955 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
-
Flowers v. K-Mart Corp.
616 P.2d 955
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
notes: “[sjince people can and daily do sustain injuries from almost all conceivable conditions under a multitude of varying circumstances, and since the possessor of the premises is not an insurer of the safety of invitees, the line between liability and non-liability must be drawn at
- Parness v. City of Tempe 600 P.2d 764 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
-
Parness v. City of Tempe
600 P.2d 764
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
For this, the City relies upon McGuire v. Valley National Bank, Walker v. Montgomery Ward and Co., Inc., and Berne v. Greyhound Parks of Arizona, Inc.
- Porterie v. Peters 532 P.2d 514 Ariz. 1975
-
Porterie v. Peters
532 P.2d 514
Ariz. 1975
Salt River Valley Water Users’ , Berne v. Greyhound Parks of Arizona, Inc.
- Walker v. Montgomery Ward & Company, Inc. 511 P.2d 699 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
-
Walker v. Montgomery Ward & Company, Inc.
511 P.2d 699
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
See, e. g., Berne v. Greyhound Parks of Arizona, Inc., , El Grande Market No. Two, Inc. v. McAlpin, 13 Ariz.App.
- Vivian Arnold Realty Co. v. McCormick 506 P.2d 1074 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
-
Vivian Arnold Realty Co. v. McCormick
506 P.2d 1074
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
See, Berne v. Greyhound Parks of Arizona, Inc.
- Randolph v. Arizona Board of Regents 505 P.2d 559 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
-
Randolph v. Arizona Board of Regents
505 P.2d 559
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
Kiser v. A. J. Bayless, 9 Ariz.App.
- Pierce v. Lopez 490 P.2d 1182 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
-
Pierce v. Lopez
490 P.2d 1182
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
Berne v. Greyhound Parks of Arizona, Inc.
- Hagan v. Sahara Caterers, Inc. 487 P.2d 9 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
-
Hagan v. Sahara Caterers, Inc.
487 P.2d 9
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Berne v. Greyhound Parks of Arizona, Inc.
- El Grande Market No. Two, Inc. v. McAlpin 475 P.2d 961 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
-
El Grande Market No. Two, Inc. v. McAlpin
475 P.2d 961
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
Berne v. Greyhound Parks of Arizona, Inc., , ; McGuire v. Valley National Bank, 94 Ariz. SO
- Burke v. Arizona Biltmore Hotel, Inc. 467 P.2d 781 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
-
Burke v. Arizona Biltmore Hotel, Inc.
467 P.2d 781
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Berne v. Greyhound Parks of Arizona, Inc.
- Compton v. National Metals Company 459 P.2d 93 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
-
Compton v. National Metals Company
459 P.2d 93
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
1 A.L.R.3d 957 (1962); Berne v. Greyhound Parks of Arizona, Inc., , Moore v. Southwestern Sash & Door Co.
- Kiser v. A. J. Bayless Markets, Inc. 449 P.2d 637 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
-
Kiser v. A. J. Bayless Markets, Inc.
449 P.2d 637
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Berne v. Greyhound Parks of Arizona, Inc.
- Vreeland v. STATE, BOARD OF REGENTS 449 P.2d 78 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
-
Vreeland v. STATE, BOARD OF REGENTS
449 P.2d 78
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
McGuire v. Valley *63 National Bank of Phoenix, , Berne v. Greyhound Parks of Arizona, Inc.