Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Berne v. Greyhound Parks of Arizona, Inc., 448 P.2d 388.

50 citing documents.

PAIRSH v. COMPASS CHRISTIAN Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
¶11 A plaintiff in a negligence action must show “the existence of a duty owed by the defendant to the plaintiff, a breach of that duty, and injury proximately caused by such breach.” Berne v. Greyhound Parks of Ariz., Inc.
Metcalf v. Montecito Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Metcalf v. Montecito Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
But “[t]he proprietor of a business premises is not an insurer of the safety of invitees and is not required at his peril to keep the premises absolutely safe.” Berne v. Greyhound Parks of Ariz., Inc.
Perez v. Circle K Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Perez v. Circle K Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
See Berne v. Greyhound Parks of Ariz., Inc., (citing cases).
Ager v. a Better Today Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Ager v. a Better Today Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Berne v. Greyhound Parks of Ariz., Inc.
Madison v. Chicago Title Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Madison v. Chicago Title Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
See Berne v. Greyhound Parks of Ariz., Inc., (noting “universal rule” that plaintiff must establish breach of a duty to prevail on a claim of negligence); Rev. Ariz. Jury Instr.
Steven H. Simon v. Safeway, Inc. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Steven H. Simon v. Safeway, Inc. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
business premises is not an insurer of the safety of invitees and is not required at his peril to keep the premises absolutely safe,” Berne v. Greyhound Parks of Ariz., Inc., Martinez and Cotterhill do not, as Safeway suggests, conflict with that principle.
Borota v. University Medical Center 861 P.2d 679 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
Borota v. University Medical Center 861 P.2d 679 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
Chiara v. Fry’s Food Stores of Arizona, Inc., , , Walker v. Montgomery Ward & Co., 20 Ariz.App.
Chiara v. Fry's Food Stores of Arizona, Inc. 733 P.2d 283 Ariz. 1987
Chiara v. Fry's Food Stores of Arizona, Inc. 733 P.2d 283 Ariz. 1987
See Berne v. Greyhound Parks of Arizona, Inc.
Smith v. Delvin 728 P.2d 1231 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Nicoletti v. Westcor, Inc. 639 P.2d 330 Ariz. 1982
Nicoletti v. Westcor, Inc. 639 P.2d 330 Ariz. 1982
Preuss v. Sambo's of Arizona, Inc. 635 P.2d 1210 Ariz. 1981
Preuss v. Sambo's of Arizona, Inc. 635 P.2d 1210 Ariz. 1981
Berne v. Greyhound Parks of Arizona, Inc.
Bloom v. Fry's Food Stores, Inc. 636 P.2d 1229 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Bloom v. Fry's Food Stores, Inc. 636 P.2d 1229 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
In doing so it distinguished the case of Berne v. Greyhound Parks of Arizona, Inc., , which is cited by appellee, on the basis that the particular dangerous condition involved there was not the necessary result of the defendant’s mode of operation.
Tom v. SS Kresge Co., Inc. 633 P.2d 439 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
Tom v. SS Kresge Co., Inc. 633 P.2d 439 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
255 , Berne v. Greyhound Parks of Arizona, Inc.
Flowers v. K-Mart Corp. 616 P.2d 955 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Flowers v. K-Mart Corp. 616 P.2d 955 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
notes: “[sjince people can and daily do sustain injuries from almost all conceivable conditions under a multitude of varying circumstances, and since the possessor of the premises is not an insurer of the safety of invitees, the line between liability and non-liability must be drawn at
Parness v. City of Tempe 600 P.2d 764 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Parness v. City of Tempe 600 P.2d 764 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
For this, the City relies upon McGuire v. Valley National Bank, Walker v. Montgomery Ward and Co., Inc., and Berne v. Greyhound Parks of Arizona, Inc.
Porterie v. Peters 532 P.2d 514 Ariz. 1975
Porterie v. Peters 532 P.2d 514 Ariz. 1975
Salt River Valley Water Users’ , Berne v. Greyhound Parks of Arizona, Inc.
Walker v. Montgomery Ward & Company, Inc. 511 P.2d 699 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Walker v. Montgomery Ward & Company, Inc. 511 P.2d 699 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
See, e. g., Berne v. Greyhound Parks of Arizona, Inc., , El Grande Market No. Two, Inc. v. McAlpin, 13 Ariz.App.
Vivian Arnold Realty Co. v. McCormick 506 P.2d 1074 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
Vivian Arnold Realty Co. v. McCormick 506 P.2d 1074 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
See, Berne v. Greyhound Parks of Arizona, Inc.
Randolph v. Arizona Board of Regents 505 P.2d 559 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
Randolph v. Arizona Board of Regents 505 P.2d 559 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
Kiser v. A. J. Bayless, 9 Ariz.App.
Pierce v. Lopez 490 P.2d 1182 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
Pierce v. Lopez 490 P.2d 1182 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
Berne v. Greyhound Parks of Arizona, Inc.
Hagan v. Sahara Caterers, Inc. 487 P.2d 9 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Hagan v. Sahara Caterers, Inc. 487 P.2d 9 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Berne v. Greyhound Parks of Arizona, Inc.
El Grande Market No. Two, Inc. v. McAlpin 475 P.2d 961 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
El Grande Market No. Two, Inc. v. McAlpin 475 P.2d 961 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
Berne v. Greyhound Parks of Arizona, Inc., , ; McGuire v. Valley National Bank, 94 Ariz. SO
Burke v. Arizona Biltmore Hotel, Inc. 467 P.2d 781 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Burke v. Arizona Biltmore Hotel, Inc. 467 P.2d 781 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Berne v. Greyhound Parks of Arizona, Inc.
Compton v. National Metals Company 459 P.2d 93 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Compton v. National Metals Company 459 P.2d 93 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
1 A.L.R.3d 957 (1962); Berne v. Greyhound Parks of Arizona, Inc., , Moore v. Southwestern Sash & Door Co.
Kiser v. A. J. Bayless Markets, Inc. 449 P.2d 637 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Kiser v. A. J. Bayless Markets, Inc. 449 P.2d 637 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Berne v. Greyhound Parks of Arizona, Inc.
Vreeland v. STATE, BOARD OF REGENTS 449 P.2d 78 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Vreeland v. STATE, BOARD OF REGENTS 449 P.2d 78 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
McGuire v. Valley *63 National Bank of Phoenix, , Berne v. Greyhound Parks of Arizona, Inc.