Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. McFall, 439 P.2d 805.

60 citing documents.

State v. Reyes 458 P.2d 960 Ariz. 1969
State v. Reyes 458 P.2d 960 Ariz. 1969
While forging an instrument is the crime of falsely and with fraudulent intent, making or altering a writing, , , the uttering of a forged instrument is the passing or publishing of a false, altered or •counterfeited paper or document.
State v. Thompson 458 P.2d 395 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
State v. Thompson 458 P.2d 395 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
which appellant has not cited.
State v. Christopher 457 P.2d 356 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
State v. Christopher 457 P.2d 356 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
the Arizona Supreme Court held that: “A confession to be free and voluntary within the meaning of the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States must not have been obtained by ‘any direct or implied promises, however slight * * * ’.” (Emphasis in original.
State v. Navallez 457 P.2d 297 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
State v. Navallez 457 P.2d 297 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Seeber v. United States, 329 F.2d 572 (9th Cir. 1964); , State *138 v. McFall, , Evidence discovered under authority of a valid search warrant is admissible.
State v. Flores 454 P.2d 172 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
State v. Flores 454 P.2d 172 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
In a recent case, , the Arizona Supreme Court inquired into a forgery confession obtained from a drug addict.