Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite OS Stapley Company v. Miller, 447 P.2d 248.

108 citing documents.

MAYWALD v. TOYOTA Ariz. 2026
JUSTICE BEENE, Opinion of the Court: ¶1 A manufacturer is liable for harm caused by a product sold “in a defective condition unreasonably dangerous.” (quoting Restatement (Second) of Torts § 402A (Am.
Ernest Quiroz Et Ux v. Alcoa Inc 416 P.3d 824 Ariz. 2018
Ernest Quiroz Et Ux v. Alcoa Inc 416 P.3d 824 Ariz. 2018
–60 (1968) (discussing strict liability for manufacturers and sellers).
State Farm Insurance Companies v. Premier Manufactured Systems, Inc. 172 P.3d 410 Ariz. 2007
State Farm Insurance Companies v. Premier Manufactured Systems, Inc. 172 P.3d 410 Ariz. 2007
-60 , -52 (1968) (quoting and adopting Restatement (Second) of Torts § 402A (1965)).
Antone v. Greater Arizona Auto Auction, Inc. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Antone v. Greater Arizona Auto Auction, Inc. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
-60, -52 (1968) (applying Restatement § 402A to facts 3 Restatement (Second) of Torts § 402A (1965) provides, in pertinent part: (1) One who sells any product in a defective condition unreasonably dangerous to the user or consumer or to his
State Farm Insurance Companies v. Premier Manufactured Systems, Inc. 142 P.3d 1232 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
State Farm Insurance Companies v. Premier Manufactured Systems, Inc. 142 P.3d 1232 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
-60 , 447 *-52 (1968); Reader v. Gen.
Winsor v. Glasswerks PHX, L.L.C. 63 P.3d 1040 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Winsor v. Glasswerks PHX, L.L.C. 63 P.3d 1040 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Colvin v. Superior Equip.
Anderson v. Nissei ASB MacH. Co., Ltd. 3 P.3d 1088 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Anderson v. Nissei ASB MacH. Co., Ltd. 3 P.3d 1088 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
(cited, along with several other cases, in Davis, 640 A.2d at 1297-98 ).
Jimenez v. Sears, Roebuck and Co. 904 P.2d 861 Ariz. 1995
Jimenez v. Sears, Roebuck and Co. 904 P.2d 861 Ariz. 1995
-60 , -52 (1968) (adopting strict liability rule of Restatement (Second) op Torts § 402A (1965), hereinafter Restatement).
Gibbs v. O'Malley Lumber Co. 868 P.2d 355 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Piper v. Bear Medical Systems, Inc. 883 P.2d 407 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Piper v. Bear Medical Systems, Inc. 883 P.2d 407 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Menendez v. Paddock Pool Construction Co. 836 P.2d 968 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Menendez v. Paddock Pool Construction Co. 836 P.2d 968 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
(citing Restatement (Second) of Torts § 402A (1965)).
Torres v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. 786 P.2d 939 Ariz. 1990
Torres v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. 786 P.2d 939 Ariz. 1990
(en banc), and its progeny.
Dillard Department Stores, Inc. v. Associated Merchandising Corp. 782 P.2d 1187 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Dillard Department Stores, Inc. v. Associated Merchandising Corp. 782 P.2d 1187 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
a jobber, Tucson Industries, Inc., , a distributor, Lunt v. Brady Mfg.
Bryant v. Continental Conveyor & Equipment Co. 751 P.2d 509 Ariz. 1988
Bryant v. Continental Conveyor & Equipment Co. 751 P.2d 509 Ariz. 1988
and Shannon v. Butler Homes, Inc., , though there had previously been dicta to that effect.
Gosewisch v. American Honda Motor Co. 737 P.2d 376 Ariz. 1987
Gosewisch v. American Honda Motor Co. 737 P.2d 376 Ariz. 1987
Trus Joist Corp. v. Safeco Insurance Co. of America 735 P.2d 125 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Trus Joist Corp. v. Safeco Insurance Co. of America 735 P.2d 125 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
McGuire v. Caterpillar Tractor Co. 728 P.2d 290 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
McGuire v. Caterpillar Tractor Co. 728 P.2d 290 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Readenour v. Marion Power Shovel 719 P.2d 1070 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Readenour v. Marion Power Shovel 719 P.2d 1070 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District v. Westinghouse Electric Corp. 694 P.2d 198 Ariz. 1984
Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District v. Westinghouse Electric Corp. 694 P.2d 198 Ariz. 1984
-52 (1968), quoting Restatement (Second) of Torts § 402(A), comment c. This policy rests, in part, on a “cost-shifting rationale,” Salt River Project v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., at 271, that merchants and manufacturers have the capacity to internalize the costs of accidental losses and dist
State Ex Rel. Corbin v. Arizona Corp. Commission 693 P.2d 362 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
State Ex Rel. Corbin v. Arizona Corp. Commission 693 P.2d 362 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
122 , vacated on other grounds
Nastri v. Wood Bros. Homes, Inc. 690 P.2d 158 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
Nastri v. Wood Bros. Homes, Inc. 690 P.2d 158 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
Dietz v. Waller 685 P.2d 744 Ariz. 1984
Dietz v. Waller 685 P.2d 744 Ariz. 1984
Restatement 2d Torts § 402A(2)(a) (1965).
Donnelly Construction Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/Gilleland 677 P.2d 1292 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Donnelly Const. Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/Gilleland 677 P.2d 1292 Ariz. 1984
Donnelly Construction Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/Gilleland 677 P.2d 1292 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
(Quoting Restatement (Second) of Torts § 402A(2)(b) (1965), this Court stated that the seller of a product is liable to a user or consumer although “the user or consumer has not bought the product from or entered into any contractual relation with the seller.”); Wetzel v. Commercial Cha
Donnelly Const. Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/Gilleland 677 P.2d 1292 Ariz. 1984
(Quoting Restatement (Second) of Torts § 402A(2)(b) (1965), this Court stated that the seller of a product is liable to a user or consumer although "the user or consumer has not bought the product from or entered into any contractual relation with the seller."); Wetzel v. Commercial Cha
Kuhnke v. Textron, Inc. 684 P.2d 159 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Kuhnke v. Textron, Inc. 684 P.2d 159 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Arrow Leasing Corp. v. Cummins Arizona Diesel, Inc. 666 P.2d 544 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Arrow Leasing Corp. v. Cummins Arizona Diesel, Inc. 666 P.2d 544 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983