Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Arnott v. Industrial Commission, 438 P.2d 419.

64 citing documents.

Bradley v. Industrial Commission 475 P.2d 296 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Bradley v. Industrial Commission 475 P.2d 296 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
In light of the rule that the situs of the residual disability is controlling, , and the case law applying that rule to facts very similar to those presented here, Pena v. Industrial Commission, supra; Heredia v. Industrial Commission, 10 Ariz.App.
Torrez v. Industrial Commission 467 P.2d 245 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Torrez v. Industrial Commission 467 P.2d 245 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
564 , : “ , in which the court indicated that the site of the disability remaining following an injury controlled what the award of compensation should be, * * * ” , stated: “ * * * The legal responsibility for workmen’s
Millikan v. Industrial Commission 466 P.2d 781 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Millikan v. Industrial Commission 466 P.2d 781 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
review denied 27 January 1970, Metcalf v. Industrial Commission, 3 Ariz.App.
Merrill v. Industrial Commission 466 P.2d 783 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Merrill v. Industrial Commission 466 P.2d 783 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
in which the court indicated that the site of the disability remaining following an injury controlled what the award of compensation should be.
Pena v. Industrial Commission 460 P.2d 1002 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Pena v. Industrial Commission 460 P.2d 1002 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Heredia v. Industrial Commission 460 P.2d 43 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Heredia v. Industrial Commission 460 P.2d 43 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
(citations omitted).” , , (1968).
Malinski v. Industrial Commission 439 P.2d 485 Ariz. 1968
Malinski v. Industrial Commission 439 P.2d 485 Ariz. 1968
As stated in Arnott v. Industrial Commission, March 7, 1968, , , we held: “As a trier of the facts, it is the privilege and the duty of the Commission— and not of an appellate court — to resolve all conflicts in the evidence, and draw warranted inferences; where more than one inference may be drawn, the Commission is at liberty to choose either, and this court will