Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Genda v. Superior Court, County of Pima, 439 P.2d 811.

66 citing documents.

  • Genda v. Genda 462 P.2d 407 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
  • Genda v. Genda 462 P.2d 407 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
    This is an appeal from the aftermath of the decision in Genda v. Superior Court, County of Pima, , wherein the court held inter alia, that the obligation of a father to support his child may extend beyond the child’s majority when the obligation is the result of a contractual agreement incorporated into the decree of divorce.
  • Johnson v. Johnson 455 P.2d 463 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
  • Gamet v. Glenn 455 P.2d 967 Ariz. 1969
  • Gamet v. Glenn 455 P.2d 967 Ariz. 1969
    For example, in Genda v. Superior Court, Pima County, , , the Court of Appeals, Division Two, had denied applications for extraordinary writs and we reviewed the matter on petitions for review.
  • Johnson v. Johnson 455 P.2d 463 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
    In Genda v. Superior Court, County of Pima, , the Supreme Court held that the superior court had jurisdiction to modify an Arizona divorce decree so as to provide for a mentally retarded son beyond the age of twenty-one years, even though both parties and child had become domiciliaries of Indiana.
  • Troxler v. Holohan 451 P.2d 662 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
  • Troxler v. Holohan 451 P.2d 662 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
  • Pedro v. Glenn 446 P.2d 31 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
  • Pedro v. Glenn 446 P.2d 31 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
    The recent Arizona Supreme Court case of Genda v. Superior Court, County of Pima, , reviews the Arizona case law in relation to Rule 1 jurisdiction and we hold that the relief sought in this Court comes within the petition.
  • San Miguel v. McCarthy 446 P.2d 22 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
  • San Miguel v. McCarthy 446 P.2d 22 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
    reviews numerous prior Arizona *324 decisions in relation to the exercise of original jurisdiction by courts of appellate jurisdiction in Arizona.
  • Spettigue v. Mahoney 445 P.2d 557 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
  • Spettigue v. Mahoney 445 P.2d 557 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
    Genda v. Superior Court, County of Pima, , and see
  • Garcia v. Frey 442 P.2d 159 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
  • Garcia v. Frey 442 P.2d 159 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
    The petitioner having applied to this court for extraordinary relief, and deeming certiorari an appropriate remedy under the circumstances, , we issued a writ of certiorari to *603 review the trial court’s action in denying the petitioner’s motion to dismiss a pending action.