Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Malinski v. Industrial Commission, 439 P.2d 485.

244 citing documents.

Barber v. Industrial Commission 544 P.2d 703 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
State Compensation Fund v. Industrial Commission 543 P.2d 154 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
State Compensation Fund v. Industrial Commission 543 P.2d 154 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Gardner v. Industrial Commission, 19 Ariz.App.
Perry v. Industrial Commission 542 P.2d 1096 Ariz. 1975
Perry v. Industrial Commission 542 P.2d 1096 Ariz. 1975
Nelson v. Industrial Commission, supra.
Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Co. of Wisconsin v. Industrial Commission 541 P.2d 580 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Co. of Wisconsin v. Industrial Commission 541 P.2d 580 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the award, , , the finding that petitioner failed to establish suitable available employment in the Tucson area must be sustained.
Eggleston v. Industrial Commission 539 P.2d 918 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Eggleston v. Industrial Commission 539 P.2d 918 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
ore, legally and factually, the instant proceeding is distinguishable from Miller v. Industrial Commission, supra.” Although we have reviewed the evidence in a light most favorable to sustaining the award, , and have resolved all conflicts in favor of the finding, , we still find that the evidence supports only one possible conclusion, , : Eggleston had disabling pain in addition to the partial loss of use of his arm.
Casson v. Industrial Commission 539 P.2d 189 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Casson v. Industrial Commission 539 P.2d 189 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Recognizing, as we must, that this Court reviews the factual record of The Industrial Commission of Arizona in a light most favorable to sustaining the award, , ; resolves all conflicts in favor of upholding the award, , and will not disturb an award if it is reasonably supported by the evidence, In re Estate of *387 Bedwell, , we still must set aside this award.
Perry v. Industrial Commission 539 P.2d 178 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Brooks v. Industrial Commission 539 P.2d 199 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Brooks v. Industrial Commission 539 P.2d 199 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Lawler v. Industrial Commission 537 P.2d 1340 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Lawler v. Industrial Commission 537 P.2d 1340 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Construing the medical record, as we must, in a light most favorable to sustaining the Commission’s award, , we find it reasonably supports the Commission’s findings.
Globe Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Commission 535 P.2d 1053 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Globe Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Commission 535 P.2d 1053 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Figueroa v. Industrial Commission 529 P.2d 1188 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Figueroa v. Industrial Commission 529 P.2d 1188 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
77 , , we find that the award is reasonably supported by the evidence.
Carranza v. Industrial Commission 529 P.2d 259 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Carranza v. Industrial Commission 529 P.2d 259 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Reynolds Metal Co. v. Industrial Commission 527 P.2d 308 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Reynolds Metal Co. v. Industrial Commission 527 P.2d 308 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Spears v. Industrial Commission, 20 Ariz.App.
Bryant v. Industrial Commission 519 P.2d 209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Bryant v. Industrial Commission 519 P.2d 209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Royal Globe Insurance Co. v. Industrial Commission 513 P.2d 970 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Royal Globe Insurance Co. v. Industrial Commission 513 P.2d 970 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Martin v. Industrial Commission 513 P.2d 383 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Martin v. Industrial Commission 513 P.2d 383 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Goldman v. Industrial Commission, 20 Ariz.App.
Scoggins v. Industrial Commission 510 P.2d 756 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Pike v. Industrial Commission 510 P.2d 387 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Pike v. Industrial Commission 510 P.2d 387 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Scoggins v. Industrial Commission 510 P.2d 756 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
See, , Montano v. Industrial Commission, 18 Ariz.App.
DuHamell v. Industrial Commission 510 P.2d 62 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
DuHamell v. Industrial Commission 510 P.2d 62 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Sutton v. Industrial Commission 509 P.2d 234 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Sutton v. Industrial Commission 509 P.2d 234 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Reviewing the evidence in the light most favorable for sustaining the Commission’s decision, , we find the award is reasonably supported by the evidence.
Grant Road Lumber Co. v. Industrial Commission 508 P.2d 750 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Grant Road Lumber Co. v. Industrial Commission 508 P.2d 750 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
State Compensation Fund v. Diaz 507 P.2d 130 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
State Compensation Fund v. Diaz 507 P.2d 130 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Gardner v. Industrial Commission 505 P.2d 261 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Gardner v. Industrial Commission 505 P.2d 261 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Hannon v. Industrial Commission, 9 Ariz.App.
State Compensation Fund v. Mohrman 503 P.2d 405 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
State Compensation Fund v. Mohrman 503 P.2d 405 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Stricklett v. Industrial Commission, 11 Ariz.App.
Anderson v. Gobea 501 P.2d 453 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
Anderson v. Gobea 501 P.2d 453 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
Sendejaz v. Industrial Commission, 4 Ariz.App.
Bishop v. Industrial Commission 495 P.2d 482 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Bishop v. Industrial Commission 495 P.2d 482 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972