Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Nace v. Nace, 448 P.2d 76.

76 citing documents.

Myrland v. Myrland 508 P.2d 757 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
Becchelli v. Becchelli 508 P.2d 59 Ariz. 1973
Bourne v. Lord 506 P.2d 268 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
Bourne v. Lord 506 P.2d 268 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
Musker v. Gil Haskins Auto Leasing, Inc. 500 P.2d 635 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Musker v. Gil Haskins Auto Leasing, Inc. 500 P.2d 635 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Kamrath v. Kamrath 498 P.2d 468 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
Kamrath v. Kamrath 498 P.2d 468 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
Wine v. Wine, 14 Ariz.App.
Becchelli v. Becchelli 497 P.2d 396 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Becchelli v. Becchelli 497 P.2d 396 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Spector v. Spector 496 P.2d 864 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
Spector v. Spector 496 P.2d 864 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
Needel v. Needel 489 P.2d 729 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
Needel v. Needel 489 P.2d 729 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
Hofstra v. Hofstra 474 P.2d 869 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Hofstra v. Hofstra 474 P.2d 869 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
We have reviewed a , ; , ; , ; , and it is our opinion that under the facts before us the Arizona case law does not ■ compel á conclusion which differs from the one reached by the trial court.
McClennen v. McClennen 464 P.2d 982 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
McClennen v. McClennen 464 P.2d 982 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Gage v. Gage 462 P.2d 93 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Gage v. Gage 462 P.2d 93 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
and the fact that a “Brown” decree was awarded makes no difference.
Calderon v. Calderon 454 P.2d 586 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Calderon v. Calderon 454 P.2d 586 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Finck v. Finck 452 P.2d 709 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Finck v. Finck 452 P.2d 709 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Hayne v. Hayne 449 P.2d 633 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Hayne v. Hayne 449 P.2d 633 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Warren v. Warren, 2 Ariz.App.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by