Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Goodman v. Gordon, 447 P.2d 230.

30 citing documents.

Crowe v. Bracale Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Crowe v. Bracale Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
state/des v. Martinez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
state/des v. Martinez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
2 On November 23, 2016, Martinez filed a motion to dismiss, which is indistinguishable from a notice of dismissal.
Ibrahim v. Eckel Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Ibrahim v. Eckel Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Turf Paradise, -42 (App. 1994); Corbin, 142 Ariz. at 425.
Calderon v. Mennenga Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Calderon v. Mennenga Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Noting that granting Calderon’s motion was “discretionary with the court, but a hearing is required before such a motion can be granted” Mennenga requested oral argument but did not request an evidentiary hearing or suggest what additional information would be shown at such a hearing.
VICARI v. Lake Havasu City 213 P.3d 367 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
VICARI v. Lake Havasu City 213 P.3d 367 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Accordingly, , our supreme court explained, It is now the well-settled rule that ...
Schurgin v. Amfac Electric Distribution Corp. 894 P.2d 730 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
Schurgin v. Amfac Electric Distribution Corp. 894 P.2d 730 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
(voluntary dismissal without prejudice permitted unless substantial right or advantage would be lost or rendered less effective).
Turf Paradise, Inc. v. Maricopa County 878 P.2d 1375 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Turf Paradise, Inc. v. Maricopa County 878 P.2d 1375 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
The County cites numerous cases involving dismissal without prejudice, 3 , (approving grant of plaintiffs motion to dismiss to permit refiling in federal court), to argue that the trial court erred in failing to consider the equities of both sides of this controversy.
Cheney v. ARIZ. SUPER. COURT FOR MARICOPA CTY. 698 P.2d 691 Ariz. 1985
Cheney v. ARIZ. SUPER. COURT FOR MARICOPA CTY. 698 P.2d 691 Ariz. 1985
Schoolhouse Educational Aids, Inc. v. Haag 699 P.2d 1318 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Schoolhouse Educational Aids, Inc. v. Haag 699 P.2d 1318 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
citing Cone v. West Virginia Pulp and Paper Company, 330 U.S. 212 , 67 S.Ct.
Crawford v. SUPERIOR COURT IN & FOR PIMA CTY. 698 P.2d 743 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
Crawford v. SUPERIOR COURT IN & FOR PIMA CTY. 698 P.2d 743 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
noting that traditionally a plaintiff had an unqualified right, upon payment of costs, to dismiss without prejudice unless the defendant would suffer some plain legal prejudice other than the mere prospect of a second lawsuit, the- Arizona Supreme Court concluded that while the rule modified the
State Ex Rel. Corbin v. Portland Cement Ass'n 690 P.2d 140 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
State Ex Rel. Corbin v. Portland Cement Ass'n 690 P.2d 140 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
and Wustrack v. Clark, 18 Ariz.App.
Penunuri v. Superior Court 565 P.2d 905 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
Penunuri v. Superior Court 565 P.2d 905 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
Wustrack v. Clark 502 P.2d 1084 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Wustrack v. Clark 502 P.2d 1084 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Skinner v. SUPERIOR COURT, IN AND FOR COUNTY OF PIMA 475 P.2d 271 Ariz. 1970
Skinner v. SUPERIOR COURT, IN AND FOR COUNTY OF PIMA 475 P.2d 271 Ariz. 1970
and Zimmerman v. Western Builders’ and Salvage Co., , 297 P. 449 .
Belcher v. Superior Court 466 P.2d 755 Ariz. 1970
Belcher v. Superior Court 466 P.2d 755 Ariz. 1970