Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Schwartz v. Schwartz, 447 P.2d 254.
- Huebner v. Deuchle 501 P.2d 417 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
- Windauer v. O'CONNOR 485 P.2d 1157 Ariz. 1971
-
Windauer v. O'CONNOR
485 P.2d 1157
Ariz. 1971
As recently as 1968 the Arizona Su *268 , “Arizona has adhered to the common law position that interspousal tort suits are not permitted.” 103 Ariz. p. 563, 447 P.2d p. 255.
- Windauer v. O'CONNOR 477 P.2d 561 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
-
Windauer v. O'CONNOR
477 P.2d 561
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
The judgment of the Court of Appeals was vacated on review, , where the court observed that “Arizona has adhered to the common law position that interspousal tort suits are not permitted.” However, this is not the holding of the court nor was the problem considered in depth, it being unnecessary to do so because in resolving the conflict of laws question t
- Burr v. Renewal Guaranty Corporation 468 P.2d 576 Ariz. 1970
- Burr v. Renewal Guaranty Corporation 468 P.2d 576 Ariz. 1970