Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Camacho v. Gardner, 456 P.2d 925.

64 citing documents.

Fridena v. Keppen 477 P.2d 271 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Fridena v. Keppen 477 P.2d 271 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
to set aside the default and we are not persuaded on appeal that the facts as presented to us compel us to set aside the decision of the trial court as being an abuse of the trial court’s discretion: “In other words, in order to uphold the sanctity of judgments, we require one seeking to open a default judgment to present a good excuse for having failed to appear and defend.”
Payne v. Payne 471 P.2d 319 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
Payne v. Payne 471 P.2d 319 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
Phoenix Airport Travelodge v. Dolgin 470 P.2d 506 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
Phoenix Airport Travelodge v. Dolgin 470 P.2d 506 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
stated: “ * * * Rule 60 (c) was amended to include ‘any other reason justifying relief from the operation of the judgment.’ Both the rules and the decision of this Court require the consideration of equity in the determination of a motion to set aside a default.- This amendment permits an even mo
Aboud v. Fenton 467 P.2d 756 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
Aboud v. Fenton 467 P.2d 756 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
and cases cited therein.
Thunderbird Farms v. Hernandez 464 P.2d 829 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
Thunderbird Farms v. Hernandez 464 P.2d 829 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
Campbell v. FRAZER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 459 P.2d 300 Ariz. 1969
Campbell v. FRAZER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 459 P.2d 300 Ariz. 1969
* * * ” In Camacho, v. Gardner, , , we gathered together many authorities which set forth the guidelines for resolving this enigma.
Tri-State Insurance Company v. Maxwell 457 P.2d 251 Ariz. 1969
Tri-State Insurance Company v. Maxwell 457 P.2d 251 Ariz. 1969