Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Ahearn v. Bailey, 451 P.2d 30.

33 citing documents.

Clark v. Campbell 193 P.3d 320 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Clark v. Campbell 193 P.3d 320 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Our supreme court has recognized that an elected official “has no vested right in the office which he holds.” , (quoting State ex rel.
State Ex Rel. Thomas v. Rayes 141 P.3d 806 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
State Ex Rel. Thomas v. Rayes 141 P.3d 806 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
57) (“It is very essential that the sharp separation of powers of government be carefully preserved by the courts to the end that one branch of government shall not be permitted to unconstitutionally encroach upon the functions properly belonging to another branch, for only in this manner can we preserve the system of checks and balances which is the genius of our government.”); , (“The concept of separation of powers is fundamental to constitutional government as we know it.”); , (“Nowhere in t
Proksa v. STATE SCHOOLS FOR DEAF AND BLIND 74 P.3d 939 Ariz. 2003
Proksa v. STATE SCHOOLS FOR DEAF AND BLIND 74 P.3d 939 Ariz. 2003
Citizens Clean Elections Commission v. Myers 1 P.3d 706 Ariz. 2000
Citizens Clean Elections Commission v. Myers 1 P.3d 706 Ariz. 2000
State Ex Rel. Woods v. Block 942 P.2d 428 Ariz. 1997
State Ex Rel. Woods v. Block 942 P.2d 428 Ariz. 1997
In this respect, this case is similar to Ahearn, v. Bailey
In Re Shannon 876 P.2d 548 Ariz. 1994
In Re Shannon 876 P.2d 548 Ariz. 1994
State v. Ramsey 831 P.2d 408 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
State v. Ramsey 831 P.2d 408 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
McDonald v. Campbell 821 P.2d 176 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
McDonald v. Campbell 821 P.2d 176 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Mecham v. Gordon 751 P.2d 957 Ariz. 1988
Mecham v. Gordon 751 P.2d 957 Ariz. 1988
Cooper v. Arizona Bd. of Pardons and Paroles 717 P.2d 861 Ariz. 1986
Wilson v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 709 P.2d 895 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Wilson v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 709 P.2d 895 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
J.W. Hancock Enterprises, Inc. v. Arizona State Registrar of Contractors 690 P.2d 119 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
J.W. Hancock Enterprises, Inc. v. Arizona State Registrar of Contractors 690 P.2d 119 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
State v. Jones 689 P.2d 561 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
State v. Jones 689 P.2d 561 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
Cochise County v. Dandoy 567 P.2d 1182 Ariz. 1977
Cochise County v. Dandoy 567 P.2d 1182 Ariz. 1977
and MacManus v. Love, 179 Colo.
State v. Williams 564 P.2d 1255 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
State v. Williams 564 P.2d 1255 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
Kilpatrick v. Superior Court 466 P.2d 18 Ariz. 1970
Kilpatrick v. Superior Court 466 P.2d 18 Ariz. 1970
Talley v. Industrial Commission 451 P.2d 886 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Talley v. Industrial Commission 451 P.2d 886 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
decided 26 February, 1969.