Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Webb v. Dixon, 455 P.2d 447.

39 citing documents.

In Re: Erica Krystal Riggins 544 P.3d 64 Ariz. 2024
In Re: Erica Krystal Riggins 544 P.3d 64 Ariz. 2024
al Code of 1922), (noting that “a later valid act of the legislature supersedes all previous acts with which it is in conflict, whether it expressly repeals the earlier provisions or not”); (discussing subsequent acts of legislature); (discussing legislative enactments under Title 16 in 1933 and 1960).
Bank of New York Mellon Trust Co. v. Arizona HOA Acceptance LLC 369 P.3d 259 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Bank of New York Mellon Trust Co. v. Arizona HOA Acceptance LLC 369 P.3d 259 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
¶ 15 , (legislative intent can be discovered by examining development of a particular statute); , (when two statutes are applicable to same subject, one general in scope and the other more limited, more specific statute controls).
Pijanowski v. Yuma County 43 P.3d 208 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Pijanowski v. Yuma County 43 P.3d 208 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
State v. Tarango 914 P.2d 1300 Ariz. 1996
State v. Tarango 914 P.2d 1300 Ariz. 1996
Id.; , -36 , -84 (1982); -76 .
State v. Tarango 895 P.2d 1009 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Academy Life Insurance v. Odiorne 797 P.2d 727 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Academy Life Insurance v. Odiorne 797 P.2d 727 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Kearney v. Mid-Century Ins.
In Re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Action No. J-70107-2 716 P.2d 404 Ariz. 1986
In Re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Action No. J-70107-2 716 P.2d 404 Ariz. 1986
A basic canon of statutory construction is that "where two statutes are in conflict in any of their provisions, the later one governs.”
Pima County v. Heinfeld 654 P.2d 281 Ariz. 1982
Pima County v. Heinfeld 654 P.2d 281 Ariz. 1982
Mead, Samuel & Co., Inc. v. Dyar 622 P.2d 512 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Mead, Samuel & Co., Inc. v. Dyar 622 P.2d 512 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Arden-Mayfair, Inc. v. STATE, DEPT. OF LIQ. LIC. & C. 599 P.2d 793 Ariz. 1979
Arden-Mayfair, Inc. v. STATE, DEPT. OF LIQ. LIC. & C. 599 P.2d 793 Ariz. 1979
Peabody Coal Co. v. Navajo County 572 P.2d 797 Ariz. 1977
Peabody Coal Co. v. Navajo County 572 P.2d 797 Ariz. 1977
Kearney v. Mid-Century Ins.
City Court of Phoenix v. State ex rel. Baumert 565 P.2d 531 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
City Court of Phoenix v. State ex rel. Baumert 565 P.2d 531 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
State v. Korte 566 P.2d 318 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
State v. Korte 566 P.2d 318 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
453 , reversed on other grounds
State v. Hannagan's Meadow Lodge Corp. 543 P.2d 797 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
State v. Hannagan's Meadow Lodge Corp. 543 P.2d 797 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Whitfield Transportation
Gieszl v. Town of Gilbert 529 P.2d 255 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Gieszl v. Town of Gilbert 529 P.2d 255 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
§ 19-142(B)), , and that a specific statute (again A.R.S.
Kearney v. Mid-Century Insurance Company 526 P.2d 169 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Kearney v. Mid-Century Insurance Company 526 P.2d 169 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
342 P.2d-195 (1959) ; , , Campbell v. Commonwealth Plan, Inc.
Didlo v. Talley 520 P.2d 540 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Didlo v. Talley 520 P.2d 540 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Maehling v. Kennedy 491 P.2d 853 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Maehling v. Kennedy 491 P.2d 853 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
State Ex Rel. Purcell v. Superior Court 485 P.2d 549 Ariz. 1971
State Ex Rel. Purcell v. Superior Court 485 P.2d 549 Ariz. 1971
SCHOOL DIST. NO. 26 (BOUSE ELEM.) OF YUMA CO. v. Strohm 469 P.2d 826 Ariz. 1970
SCHOOL DIST. NO. 26 (BOUSE ELEM.) OF YUMA CO. v. Strohm 469 P.2d 826 Ariz. 1970