Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. King, 182 P.2d 915.
- State of Arizona v. Dwandarrius Jamar Robinson 509 P.3d 1023 Ariz. 2022
-
State of Arizona v. Dwandarrius Jamar Robinson
509 P.3d 1023
Ariz. 2022
Though not an absolute prohibition, courts usually will permit leading questioning only “as necessary to develop the witness’s testimony,” id., or “when doing so will serve ‘the ends of justice,’” Payne, 233 Ariz. at 513 ¶ 119 ().
- State of Arizona v. Christopher Mathew Payne 306 P.3d 17 Ariz. 2013
-
State of Arizona v. Christopher Mathew Payne
306 P.3d 17
Ariz. 2013
See State v. (Joseph W.) King
- Chronis v. Steinle 208 P.3d 210 Ariz. 2009
-
Chronis v. Steinle
208 P.3d 210
Ariz. 2009
ion case the “facts and circumstances” supporting “legal sufficiency of the affidavit of probable cause”); ¶ 19, (noting in context of malicious prosecution case that “the 5 evidence was legally sufficient for a jury determination of no probable cause”); -46, (noting in criminal case that whether “the evidence was legally sufficient .
- State v. Duffy 603 P.2d 538 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
-
State v. Duffy
603 P.2d 538
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Wackerman v. Wackerman, 16 Ariz.App.
- State v. Jerousek 590 P.2d 1366 Ariz. 1979
- State v. Jerousek 590 P.2d 1366 Ariz. 1979
- State v. Jones 521 P.2d 978 Ariz. 1974
- State v. Jones 521 P.2d 978 Ariz. 1974
- State v. Morales 520 P.2d 1136 Ariz. 1974
-
State v. Morales
520 P.2d 1136
Ariz. 1974
rehearing denied, , cert.
- State v. Money 514 P.2d 1014 Ariz. 1973
- State v. Money 514 P.2d 1014 Ariz. 1973
- State v. Aldridge 502 P.2d 1355 Ariz. 1972
-
State v. Aldridge
502 P.2d 1355
Ariz. 1972
we find the following comment with reference to the failure to endorse a witness as provided by Rule 153: ‘These rules do not in express terms provide that the effect of a failure to endorse the name of a witness disqualifies the unnamed person as a witness.
- State ex rel. Berger v. Superior Court 493 P.2d 908 Ariz. 1972
- State ex rel. Berger v. Superior Court 493 P.2d 908 Ariz. 1972
- State v. Miller 491 P.2d 485 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
-
State v. Miller
491 P.2d 485
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
State v. Von Reeden, 9 Ariz.App.
- State v. Marin 490 P.2d 1170 Ariz. 1971
-
State v. Marin
490 P.2d 1170
Ariz. 1971
Rule 305, Rules of Criminal Procedure, 17 A.R.S.; Article 6, § 22 of the Arizona Constitution, A.R.S.; State v. Thompson, supra
- State v. Godsoe 489 P.2d 4 Ariz. 1971
- State v. Godsoe 489 P.2d 4 Ariz. 1971
- State v. Williams 485 P.2d 832 Ariz. 1971
-
State v. Williams
485 P.2d 832
Ariz. 1971
“ * * * no case was ever so perfectly tried that it was not subject to some criticism.” The test to be applied is whether there is a reasonable probability that had the asserted error not been committed, the verdict would have been different.
- State v. Van Winkle 478 P.2d 105 Ariz. 1970
-
State v. Van Winkle
478 P.2d 105
Ariz. 1970
While we appreciate the fact that, due to the human equation, no case was ever so perfectly tried that it could not be subject to some criticism, , , still one accused of crime, particularly a man on trial for his life, is entitled to a fair and impartial trial which does not violate any of his substantial rights.
- State v. Rackley 477 P.2d 255 Ariz. 1970
- State v. Rackley 477 P.2d 255 Ariz. 1970
- State v. Von Reeden 450 P.2d 702 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
-
State v. Von Reeden
450 P.2d 702
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
we find the following comment with reference to the failure to endorse a witness as provided by Rule 153: “These rules do not in express terms provide that the effect of a failure to endorse the name of a witness disqualifies the unnamed person as a witness.
- State v. Hunter 433 P.2d 22 Ariz. 1967
- State v. Hunter 433 P.2d 22 Ariz. 1967
- State v. Simoneau 401 P.2d 404 Ariz. 1965
- State v. Simoneau 401 P.2d 404 Ariz. 1965
- State v. Lovell 399 P.2d 674 Ariz. 1965
- State v. Lovell 399 P.2d 674 Ariz. 1965
- State v. Sorrell 388 P.2d 429 Ariz. 1964
- State v. Sorrell 388 P.2d 429 Ariz. 1964
- State v. Weis 375 P.2d 735 Ariz. 1962
- State v. Weis 375 P.2d 735 Ariz. 1962
- State v. Holliday 375 P.2d 370 Ariz. 1962
- State v. Holliday 375 P.2d 370 Ariz. 1962
- State v. Mathis 375 P.2d 388 Ariz. 1962
- State v. Mathis 375 P.2d 388 Ariz. 1962
- State v. Silvas 372 P.2d 718 Ariz. 1962
- State v. Silvas 372 P.2d 718 Ariz. 1962