Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Armer v. Armer, 463 P.2d 818.
- Everson v. Everson 537 P.2d 624 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
- Everson v. Everson 537 P.2d 624 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
- Spector v. Spector 531 P.2d 176 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
- Spector v. Spector 531 P.2d 176 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
- O'Hair v. O'Hair 508 P.2d 66 Ariz. 1973
- O'Hair v. O'Hair 508 P.2d 66 Ariz. 1973
- Kamrath v. Kamrath 498 P.2d 468 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
-
Kamrath v. Kamrath
498 P.2d 468
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
Wine v. Wine, 14 Ariz.App.
- Witherspoon v. Witherspoon 498 P.2d 233 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
-
Witherspoon v. Witherspoon
498 P.2d 233
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
Mc-Clennen v. McClennen, 11 Ariz.App.
- Wick v. Wick 489 P.2d 19 Ariz. 1971
- Wick v. Wick 489 P.2d 19 Ariz. 1971
- Allied Contract Buyers v. Lucero Contracting Co. 476 P.2d 521 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
- Allied Contract Buyers v. Lucero Contracting Co. 476 P.2d 521 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
- Anonymous v. Anonymous 475 P.2d 268 Ariz. 1970
-
Anonymous v. Anonymous
475 P.2d 268
Ariz. 1970
[Citation omitted.]” , .
- Hofstra v. Hofstra 474 P.2d 869 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
-
Hofstra v. Hofstra
474 P.2d 869
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
We have reviewed a , ; , ; , ; , and it is our opinion that under the facts before us the Arizona case law does not ■ compel á conclusion which differs from the one reached by the trial court.