Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite E. L. Jones Construction Co. v. Noland, 466 P.2d 740.

92 citing documents.

W. R. Skousen Contractor, Inc. v. Gray 546 P.2d 369 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
W. R. Skousen Contractor, Inc. v. Gray 546 P.2d 369 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Middleton v. Wallichs Music & Entertainment Co. 536 P.2d 1072 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Middleton v. Wallichs Music & Entertainment Co. 536 P.2d 1072 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Allison Steel Manufacturing Co. v. Superior Court 523 P.2d 803 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1974
Allison Steel Manufacturing Co. v. Superior Court 523 P.2d 803 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1974
Parks v. Atkinson, 19 Ariz.App.
Bible v. First National Bank of Rawlins 515 P.2d 351 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Bible v. First National Bank of Rawlins 515 P.2d 351 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Citizen's Utility, Inc. v. Livingston 515 P.2d 345 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
Citizen's Utility, Inc. v. Livingston 515 P.2d 345 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
Parks v. Atkinson, 19 Ariz.App.
Davis v. Marquardt 513 P.2d 379 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Davis v. Marquardt 513 P.2d 379 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Blue Bar Taxicab & , 216 P. 246 (1923); Swick v. White, 18 Ariz.App.
Jackson v. Sergent, Hauskins & Beckwith Engineers, Inc. 512 P.2d 862 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Jackson v. Sergent, Hauskins & Beckwith Engineers, Inc. 512 P.2d 862 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
See E. L. Jones Construction Co. v. No- *331 land, , German v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co., 11 Ariz.App.
Lancaster v. Chemi-Cote Perlite Corporation 511 P.2d 673 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Lancaster v. Chemi-Cote Perlite Corporation 511 P.2d 673 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Moser v. Mardian Construction Company 509 P.2d 1064 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Moser v. Mardian Construction Company 509 P.2d 1064 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
The general rule regarding appellate review of the granting or denying of a , : “The granting or denying of a new trial on the ground that the conduct of counsel before a jury deprived the defendant of a fair trial is a matter within the sound discretion of the trial court, [citation omitted].
Anderson Aviation Sales Company, Inc. v. Perez 508 P.2d 87 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Anderson Aviation Sales Company, Inc. v. Perez 508 P.2d 87 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Muehlebach v. Mercer Mortuary and Chapel, Inc.
Goedecke v. Price 506 P.2d 1105 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
Goedecke v. Price 506 P.2d 1105 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
Parks v. Atkinson 505 P.2d 279 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
Parks v. Atkinson 505 P.2d 279 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
Swick v. White 504 P.2d 50 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Swick v. White 504 P.2d 50 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Blue Bar Taxicab, etc., , 216 P. 246 (1923).
East Camelback Homeowners Ass'n v. Arizona Foundation for Neurology & Psychiatry 500 P.2d 906 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
East Camelback Homeowners Ass'n v. Arizona Foundation for Neurology & Psychiatry 500 P.2d 906 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
See, , ; Tanner v. Pacioni, 3 Ariz.App.
Purcell v. Zimbelman 500 P.2d 335 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
Purcell v. Zimbelman 500 P.2d 335 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
Hlavaty v. Song 491 P.2d 460 Ariz. 1971
Hlavaty v. Song 491 P.2d 460 Ariz. 1971
Arizona Public Service Company v. Brittain 486 P.2d 176 Ariz. 1971
Arizona Public Service Company v. Brittain 486 P.2d 176 Ariz. 1971
They are not spaced uniformly.” Also, viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to plaintiff, , , it would appear that Arizona Public Service Company had knowledge of the unique performance characteristics of helicopters ; that such characteristics made them especially adaptable for use in remote and rugged areas; that helicopters had been seen operating in the Bradshaw Mountain-Crown King a
Basurto v. Utah Construction & Mining Company 485 P.2d 859 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
Basurto v. Utah Construction & Mining Company 485 P.2d 859 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
Reber Ex Rel. Industrial Commission v. Chandler High School District 202 474 P.2d 852 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Reber Ex Rel. Industrial Commission v. Chandler High School District 202 474 P.2d 852 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
German v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Company, 11 Ariz.App.
Livingston v. Citizen's Utility, Inc. 474 P.2d 453 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
Livingston v. Citizen's Utility, Inc. 474 P.2d 453 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
the Arizona Supreme Court delineated the landowner’s duty as to hidden defects, § 344, citing a
Santanello v. Cooper 468 P.2d 390 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Santanello v. Cooper 468 P.2d 390 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Waid v. Bergschneider, supra; Muehlebach v. Mercer Mortuary and Chapel, Inc. supra.