DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Singleton, 182 P.2d 920.

127 citing documents.

  • State v. Evans 356 P.2d 1106 Ariz. 1960
  • State v. Holman 356 P.2d 27 Ariz. 1960
  • State v. Holman 356 P.2d 27 Ariz. 1960
  • State v. Milton 331 P.2d 846 Ariz. 1958
  • State v. Milton 331 P.2d 846 Ariz. 1958
  • Application of Vigileos v. State 330 P.2d 116 Ariz. 1958
  • Application of Vigileos v. State 330 P.2d 116 Ariz. 1958
    The fact that a preliminary examination was neither had nor waived shall in no case invalidate any information in any court unless the defendant objects to such information *408 because of such fact before pleading to the merits.” , ; , .
  • State v. Dutton 318 P.2d 667 Ariz. 1957
  • State v. Dutton 318 P.2d 667 Ariz. 1957
    In applying this constitutional provision our prior decisions, , , at page 66, , at page 930, have laid down this test: had the error pointed out not been committed is there reasonable probability that the verdict might have been different?
  • State v. Stago 312 P.2d 160 Ariz. 1957
  • State v. Stago 312 P.2d 160 Ariz. 1957
    may be examined on whether he has suffered a previous conviction of a felony, , ; , 212 P. 458 , it is also equally well settled that a prosecuting officer, in order to impeach him as a witness, cannot engage in questioning which casts insinuations without being prepared and able to prove the insinuations, , .
  • State v. Marsin 307 P.2d 607 Ariz. 1957
  • State v. Colvin 307 P.2d 98 Ariz. 1957
  • State v. Marsin 307 P.2d 607 Ariz. 1957
  • State v. Colvin 307 P.2d 98 Ariz. 1957
  • State v. Folk 277 P.2d 1016 Ariz. 1954
  • State v. Folk 277 P.2d 1016 Ariz. 1954
    State v. Singleton, 1947, , .
  • State v. Polan 278 P.2d 432 Ariz. 1954
  • State v. Polan 278 P.2d 432 Ariz. 1954
    State v. Singleton, 1947, , .
  • State v. Elias 249 P.2d 941 Ariz. 1952
  • State v. Elias 249 P.2d 941 Ariz. 1952
  • State v. Serna 211 P.2d 455 Ariz. 1949
  • State v. Serna 211 P.2d 455 Ariz. 1949
  • State v. Hendricks 186 P.2d 943 Ariz. 1947
  • State v. Hendricks 186 P.2d 943 Ariz. 1947
    A. Not me, no, no sir.” *244 , decided July 11, 1947, not yet reported [in State reports] : “But when, as here, such questioning is raised and then dropped with no further attempt on the part of the State to prove its point, the aforementioned ‘fishing expedition’ having failed, we believe it to be wholly improper and highly prejudicial.
  • Ruth v. Rhodes 185 P.2d 304 Ariz. 1947
  • Ruth v. Rhodes 185 P.2d 304 Ariz. 1947