Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite In Re Estate of Cohen, 464 P.2d 620.

38 citing documents.

Elliston v. Elliston Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Elliston v. Elliston Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
¶13 Noting that Husband was unable to provide examples of past threats, Wife argues that Husband was acting based only on a subjective belief that she would destroy his property, which she asserts is insufficient to meet his burden of proof under – 42 (1970).
Rezaik v. Farmers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Rezaik v. Farmers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
¶ 37, In re: Estate of Cohen, -41, - 24 (1970); -12 (1951); 268 P. 181, 184 (1928); ¶ 27, review denied (Jan.
Ry-Tan Construction, Inc. v. Washington Elementary School District No. 6 93 P.3d 1095 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Ry-Tan Construction, Inc. v. Washington Elementary School District No. 6 93 P.3d 1095 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
(applying judicial estoppel); see also Black’s Law Dictionary 571 (7th ed.1999), 875 (6th ed.1990) (discussing estoppel by laches).
USLife Title Co. of Arizona v. Gutkin 732 P.2d 579 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
USLife Title Co. of Arizona v. Gutkin 732 P.2d 579 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Republic National Life Insurance v. Rudine 668 P.2d 905 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Republic National Life Insurance v. Rudine 668 P.2d 905 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Staffco, Inc. v. Maricopa Trading Co. 595 P.2d 31 Ariz. 1979
Staffco, Inc. v. Maricopa Trading Co. 595 P.2d 31 Ariz. 1979
Colonia Verde Homeowners Ass'n v. Kaufman 596 P.2d 712 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
Colonia Verde Homeowners Ass'n v. Kaufman 596 P.2d 712 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
402 , , Standage Ventures
Standage Ventures, Inc. v. State 562 P.2d 360 Ariz. 1977
Standage Ventures, Inc. v. State 562 P.2d 360 Ariz. 1977
Barnette v. McNulty 516 P.2d 583 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
Barnette v. McNulty 516 P.2d 583 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
State Farm Auto. Ins. Co. v. CIVIL SERV. EMP. INS. 509 P.2d 725 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
State Farm Automobile Insurance v. Civil Service Employees Insurance 509 P.2d 725 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
State Farm Auto. Ins. Co. v. CIVIL SERV. EMP. INS. 509 P.2d 725 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
State Farm Automobile Insurance v. Civil Service Employees Insurance 509 P.2d 725 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
and Otis Elevator Co. v. Valley National Bank, 8 Ariz.App.
Sailes v. Jones 499 P.2d 721 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Sailes v. Jones 499 P.2d 721 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Mecham v. City of Glendale 489 P.2d 65 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Mecham v. City of Glendale 489 P.2d 65 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Green Reservoir Flood Control District v. Willmoth 489 P.2d 69 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
Green Reservoir Flood Control District v. Willmoth 489 P.2d 69 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
Smith v. Monroe 488 P.2d 1003 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
Smith v. Monroe 488 P.2d 1003 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
83 , In re Cohen’s Estate
Wick v. Wick 481 P.2d 298 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Wick v. Wick 481 P.2d 298 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
See also, In re Estate of Henry, supra; , ; , 216 P. 689 (1923) ; Restatement of Contracts § 492 (1932).
State v. Hogue 479 P.2d 417 Ariz. 1971
State v. Hogue 479 P.2d 417 Ariz. 1971
[Emphasis added] at 340 , at 623 (1970); , State v. Horn, 9 Ariz.App.
Fridena v. Keppen 477 P.2d 271 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Fridena v. Keppen 477 P.2d 271 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
* * * ’ ” In re Cohen’s Estate
State v. Bridges 468 P.2d 604 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
State v. Bridges 468 P.2d 604 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
While a defendant in a criminal case, conceivably, may not be subject to judicial estoppel as one would be in a civil case, , it is our opinion, in the face of the record made at the time of the entry of the plea, that it was the affirmative duty of the defendant to show that the essentials of a voluntary plea were lacking.