Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Morari v. Atlantic Mutual Fire Insurance Company, 468 P.2d 564.

36 citing documents.

United v. Associated Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
United v. Associated Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Co., -39 (1970) (relying in part on insurance policy’s “loading and unloading clause,” the court held an injury arose out of the use of a vehicle where the injury was caused by a hunting rifle discharging while the driver was unloading it from an insured vehicle that was specifically used to transport hunters and their
Allstate Insurance v. Johnston 984 P.2d 10 Ariz. 1999
Allstate Insurance v. Johnston 984 P.2d 10 Ariz. 1999
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Loesl 977 P.2d 140 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Loesl 977 P.2d 140 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Tobel v. Travelers Insurance 988 P.2d 148 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Tobel v. Travelers Insurance 988 P.2d 148 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Co., , , (1970); Benevides v. Arizona Prop.
Allstate Insurance v. Powers 949 P.2d 521 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Allstate Insurance v. Powers 949 P.2d 521 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Co., , Allstate was not liable under the homeowner’s policy for Lawrence’s injuries because the injury falls within the policy’s exclusion relating to the loading or unloading of a motor vehicle.
Benevides v. AZ PROPERTY & CAS. INS. 911 P.2d 616 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Benevides v. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund 911 P.2d 616 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Benevides v. AZ PROPERTY & CAS. INS. 911 P.2d 616 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Benevides v. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund 911 P.2d 616 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Ruiz v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona 865 P.2d 762 Ariz. 1993
Ruiz v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona 865 P.2d 762 Ariz. 1993
Co., , Love v. Farmers Ins.
Ruiz v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona 847 P.2d 111 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Ruiz v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona 847 P.2d 111 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
However, Arizona courts on several occasions have considered the general issue of when an injury arises out of the ownership, maintenance or use of a vehicle: , , , Vanguard Insurance Co. v. Cantrell, 18 Ariz.App.
Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona v. Till 825 P.2d 954 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona v. Till 825 P.2d 954 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Co., -39 , -66 (1970), quoting Columbia Southern Chemical Corp. v. Manufacturers and Wholesalers Indemnity Exchange, 190 Cal.App.2d 194, 201-02 , 11 Cal.Rptr.
Scottsdale Insurance v. Van Nguyen 763 P.2d 540 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
American Modern Home Insurance v. Rocha 729 P.2d 949 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
American Modern Home Insurance v. Rocha 729 P.2d 949 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Associated Indemnity Corp. v. Warner 694 P.2d 1199 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Associated Indemnity Corp. v. Warner 694 P.2d 1199 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
-39 , -67 (1970); Brenner v. Aetna Insurance Co., 8 Ariz.App.
Love v. Farmers Insurance Group 588 P.2d 364 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
Love v. Farmers Insurance Group 588 P.2d 364 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
Mission Insurance v. Aid Insurance Services 585 P.2d 240 Ariz. 1978
Mission Insurance v. Aid Insurance Services 585 P.2d 240 Ariz. 1978
Aid points out, however, that we have previously construed the phrase “use, including loading and unloading,” as it appeared in an insurance policy, as “expanding the coverage intended by ‘use’ or ‘using’.”
Engeldinger v. State Automobile & Casualty Underwriters 236 N.W.2d 596 Minn. 1975
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Transport Indemnity Co. 505 P.2d 227 Ariz. 1973
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Transport Indemnity Co. 505 P.2d 227 Ariz. 1973
Co., , , one passenger shot another passenger while attempting to unload his gun from the vehicle.
Farmers Insurance Group v. Home Indemnity Co. 493 P.2d 909 Ariz. 1972
Farmers Insurance Group v. Home Indemnity Co. 493 P.2d 909 Ariz. 1972
Mazon v. Farmers Insurance Exchange 475 P.2d 957 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
Mazon v. Farmers Insurance Exchange 475 P.2d 957 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
In a recent Arizona Supreme Court decision, , the Court analyzed the same general requirement as here — that an accident must arise out of the operation or use of the motor vehicle.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by