Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Greyhound Parks of Arizona, Inc. v. Waitman, 464 P.2d 966.
- Joel Carson v. Hon. gentry/state Ariz. 2025
-
Joel Carson v. Hon. gentry/state
Ariz. 2025
Greyhound Parks of Ariz., (noting that “a construction should be adopted which avoids constitutional doubts”); see Antonin Scalia & Bryan A. Garner, Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts 247–51 (2012).
- Gelin v. Murray 494 P.3d 1112 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
-
Gelin v. Murray
494 P.3d 1112
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
If a provision of a statute is ambiguous, “all parts and provisions must be considered and construed together.” Greyhound Parks of Ariz.
- Johnson Utilities LLC v. Arizona Corporation Ariz. 2020
-
Johnson Utilities LLC v. Arizona Corporation
Ariz. 2020
34 JOHNSON UTILITIES, L.L.C. V. ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION, ET AL. JUSTICE BOLICK, CONCURRING IN PART, DISSENTING IN PART are available, we should choose that which avoids constitutional difficulty.”); Greyhound Parks of Ariz., (explaining and applying canon of constitutional avoidance); Antonin Scalia & Bryan A. Garner, Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts 247–51 (2012).
- Laveen Meadows v. Mejia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Laveen Meadows v. Mejia
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
If a statute is ambiguous on its face, this court must seek to ascertain the meaning intended by the Legislature “from the language used in the statute, aided by the canons and rules of statutory construction.” Greyhound Parks of Ariz.
- Jones v. Sterling 110 P.3d 1271 Ariz. 2005
-
Jones v. Sterling
110 P.3d 1271
Ariz. 2005
See Greyhound Parks of Ariz.
- Smalley v. Detrick 859 P.2d 1341 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
-
Smalley v. Detrick
859 P.2d 1341
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
604 , 112 L.Ed.2d 617 (1991); Greyhound Parks of Arizona
- Slayton v. Shumway 800 P.2d 590 Ariz. 1990
-
Slayton v. Shumway
800 P.2d 590
Ariz. 1990
Greyhound Parks, , 2A J. SUTHERLAND, STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION § 45.11, at 46 (Sands 4th ed. 1984).
- Beck v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. 737 P.2d 402 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
-
Beck v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.
737 P.2d 402
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Greyhound Parks of Arizona
- Pinto Valley Copper Corp. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 706 P.2d 1251 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
- Pinto Valley Copper Corp. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 706 P.2d 1251 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
- One Hundred Eighteen Members of Blue Sky Mobile Home Owners Ass'n v. Murdock 682 P.2d 422 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
-
One Hundred Eighteen Members of Blue Sky Mobile Home Owners Ass'n v. Murdock
682 P.2d 422
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Number One of Pinal County, , Greyhound Parks of Ariz., , , 281 P. 46 (1929).
- State v. City Court of City of Tucson 673 P.2d 988 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
- State v. City Court of City of Tucson 673 P.2d 988 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
- McIntyre v. Mohave County 618 P.2d 621 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
-
McIntyre v. Mohave County
618 P.2d 621
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Also see, Greyhound Parks of Arizona
- Schilling v. Embree 575 P.2d 1262 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
-
Schilling v. Embree
575 P.2d 1262
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
Greyhound Parks of Arizona
- State v. Standsberry 560 P.2d 1258 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
-
State v. Standsberry
560 P.2d 1258
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Greyhound Parks of Arizona, , Lombardo v. Pollock, 21 Ariz.App.
- Mardian Construction Co. v. Superior Court 557 P.2d 526 Ariz. 1976
-
Mardian Construction Co. v. Superior Court
557 P.2d 526
Ariz. 1976
Greyhound Parks of Arizona
- Becchelli v. Becchelli 497 P.2d 396 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
-
Becchelli v. Becchelli
497 P.2d 396
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Greyhound Parks of Arizona v. Waitman, *284
- Arizona State Tax Commission v. Lawrence Manufacturing Co. 489 P.2d 860 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
-
Arizona State Tax Commission v. Lawrence Manufacturing Co.
489 P.2d 860
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
Plaintiff also asserts that the construction urged by defendant 5 is unconstitutional, as a violation of the equal protection clause, and that as between a constitutional and unconstitutional construction of an ambiguous statute, the constitutional construction should be adopted, citing Greyhound Parks of America