Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Mountain View Pioneer Hospital v. Employment Security Commission, 482 P.2d 448.

30 citing documents.

Stagecoach Trails MHC, L.L.C. v. City of Benson 278 P.3d 314 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
Stagecoach Trails MHC, L.L.C. v. City of Benson 278 P.3d 314 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
Comm’n, , (superi- or court lacks jurisdiction if party failed to follow statutory administrative procedures); , (same); -46 , -31 (App.1992) (same).
Baker v. Rolnick 110 P.3d 1284 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Baker v. Rolnick 110 P.3d 1284 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Walters v. Maricopa County 990 P.2d 677 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Walters v. Maricopa County 990 P.2d 677 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Comm’n, -85 , -52 (1971) (ten-day period for petitioning for hearing on disputed unemployment security contributions); Campbell, 102 Ariz. at 257-58 , 428 P.2d at 114-15 (ten-day and thirty-day periods for motorists to appeal license suspensions); Brown v. Industrial Comm’n
Southwest Ambulance of Southeastern Arizona, Inc. v. Superior Court 928 P.2d 714 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Southwest Ambulance of Southeastern Arizona, Inc. v. Superior Court 928 P.2d 714 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Comm’n, , -46 , -31 (App.1992), cert.
Hamilton v. State 925 P.2d 731 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Kerr v. Waddell 916 P.2d 1173 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Hamilton v. State 925 P.2d 731 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Comm’n, , (“When a party fails to exhaust all his administrative remedies ...
Kerr v. Waddell 916 P.2d 1173 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Medina v. Arizona Department of Transportation 916 P.2d 1130 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Medina v. Arizona Department of Transportation 916 P.2d 1130 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Estate of Bohn v. Waddell 848 P.2d 324 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Estate of Bohn v. Waddell 848 P.2d 324 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Comm’n, , (“When a party fails to exhaust all his administrative remedies ...
St. Mary's Hospital & Health Center v. State 721 P.2d 666 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
St. Mary's Hospital & Health Center v. State 721 P.2d 666 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
459, 463 , 82 L.Ed.2d 638 (1938); Breeland v. Southern Pacific Company, 231 F.2d 576 (9th Cir.1955); , , , , , Ladd v. New York Central Railroad Co., 170 Ohio St.
Wallis v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 617 P.2d 534 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Wallis v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 617 P.2d 534 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
(party failed to follow procedures for seeking review in superior court mandated by A.R.S.
Valley Vendors Corp. v. City of Phoenix 616 P.2d 951 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Valley Vendors Corp. v. City of Phoenix 616 P.2d 951 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
The supreme court’s explanation of the reason for requiring a taxpayer to exhaust the remedies of the state’s , aptly describes our reasoning in this case: “The main purpose in requiring an administrative hearing is to remove the onus of a great volume of complicated tax cases from unnecessary judicial review and to initially place them before a specialized tribunal trained to handle such matters.” Id.
Univar Corp. v. City of Phoenix 594 P.2d 86 Ariz. 1979
Univar Corp. v. City of Phoenix 594 P.2d 86 Ariz. 1979
Foremost Life Insurance v. Trimble 580 P.2d 360 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Foremost Life Insurance v. Trimble 580 P.2d 360 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
State Board of Dental Examiners v. Hoffman 531 P.2d 161 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
State Board of Dental Examiners v. Hoffman 531 P.2d 161 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Campbell v. SUPERIOR CT, IN & FOR CTY. OF MARICOPA 501 P.2d 463 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Campbell v. SUPERIOR CT, IN & FOR CTY. OF MARICOPA 501 P.2d 463 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Comm., , Smotkin v. Peterson, supra; Williams v. Bankers National Ins.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by