Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Serna, 211 P.2d 455.

33 citing documents.

State v. Canion 16 P.3d 788 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
State v. Diaz 813 P.2d 728 Ariz. 1991
State v. Diaz 813 P.2d 728 Ariz. 1991
Dutton, , (a defendant cannot complain on appeal that an instruction placed burden of proving innocence upon defendant, when defendant did not object to instruction at trial and in fact requested it); , , ( , cert.
State v. Lujan 604 P.2d 629 Ariz. 1979
State v. Lujan 604 P.2d 629 Ariz. 1979
State v. Ceja 546 P.2d 6 Ariz. 1976
State v. Ceja 546 P.2d 6 Ariz. 1976
State v. Richmond 540 P.2d 700 Ariz. 1975
State v. Richmond 540 P.2d 700 Ariz. 1975
State v. Taylor 537 P.2d 938 Ariz. 1975
State v. Taylor 537 P.2d 938 Ariz. 1975
601 (1968), , ; , ; 1 Wharton’s Criminal Law § 251 at 539.” 14 Ariz.App.
State v. Arredondo 526 P.2d 163 Ariz. 1974
State v. Arredondo 526 P.2d 163 Ariz. 1974
State v. Jaramillo 522 P.2d 1079 Ariz. 1974
State v. Jaramillo 522 P.2d 1079 Ariz. 1974
appeal dismissed and cert.
In Re Anonymous, Juvenile Court No. 6358-4 484 P.2d 235 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
In Re Anonymous, Juvenile Court No. 6358-4 484 P.2d 235 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
601 (1968), , , ; 1 Wharton’s Criminal Law § 251 at 539.
State v. Acosta 416 P.2d 560 Ariz. 1966
State v. Acosta 416 P.2d 560 Ariz. 1966
appeal dismissed, Serna v. Walters, 339 U.S. 973 , 70 S.Ct.
State v. Cofhlin 412 P.2d 864 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
State v. Cofhlin 412 P.2d 864 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
State v. Adams 400 P.2d 360 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
State v. Adams 400 P.2d 360 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
State v. Serna (1949) , .
State v. Garcia 393 P.2d 668 Ariz. 1964
State v. Garcia 393 P.2d 668 Ariz. 1964
86 A.L.R.2d 1120 ; , ; , , cert, denied 339 U.S. 973 , 70 S.Ct.
State v. Akins 383 P.2d 180 Ariz. 1963
State v. Akins 383 P.2d 180 Ariz. 1963
When a homicide is committed for the purpose of robbery, premeditation is not an element, the robbery being the legal equivalent of premeditation, , , cert.
State v. Evans 356 P.2d 1106 Ariz. 1960
State v. Evans 356 P.2d 1106 Ariz. 1960
State v. Jordan 294 P.2d 677 Ariz. 1956
State v. Jordan 294 P.2d 677 Ariz. 1956
is in conflict with the Perez case and the general rule on the subject.
Tomaris v. State 224 P.2d 209 Ariz. 1950
Tomaris v. State 224 P.2d 209 Ariz. 1950
138 P. 1048 , holding that remarks similar to the one quoted above, are not comments in violation of section 44-2704, supra.