Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Apache County v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co., 476 P.2d 657.

24 citing documents.

MacHu v. Pinal County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
MacHu v. Pinal County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Aileen H. Char Life Interest v. Maricopa County 93 P.3d 486 Ariz. 2004
Aileen H. Char Life Interest v. Maricopa County 93 P.3d 486 Ariz. 2004
We examined the meaning of the word “class,” for Uniformity Clause purposes, in Apache County v. Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co.
Bahr v. State 985 P.2d 564 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Bahr v. State 985 P.2d 564 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Co., , app. dismissed sub nom.
Cutter Aviation, Inc. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 958 P.2d 1 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Cutter Aviation, Inc. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 958 P.2d 1 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Co., , (property of railroad company may be classified differently from identical property in another industry).
Maricopa County v. State 928 P.2d 699 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Maricopa County v. State 928 P.2d 699 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Co., , appeal dismissed, 401 U.S. 1005 , 91 S.Ct.
America West Airlines, Inc. v. Deparment of Revenue 880 P.2d 1074 Ariz. 1994
America West Airlines, Inc. v. Deparment of Revenue 880 P.2d 1074 Ariz. 1994
Co., , (quoting Browning, 310 U.S. at 368 , 60 S.Ct.
Hibbs v. Chandler Ginning Co. 790 P.2d 297 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Hibbs v. Chandler Ginning Co. 790 P.2d 297 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
See Apache County v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company
Arizona Department of Revenue v. Trico Electric Cooperative, Inc. 729 P.2d 898 Ariz. 1986
Arizona Department of Revenue v. Trico Electric Cooperative, Inc. 729 P.2d 898 Ariz. 1986
“The only restraint placed upon the legislature by this provision is that when property has once been classified the rate must be uniform upon all property of the same class.” Apache County v. Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co., , (emphasis added), appeal dismissed, 401 U.S. 1005 , 91 S.Ct.
Mountain States Legal Foundation v. Apache County 706 P.2d 1246 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Mountain States Legal Foundation v. Apache County 706 P.2d 1246 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
County of Maricopa v. North Central Development Co. 566 P.2d 688 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. v. ARIZ. INS. GUAR. ASS'N 528 P.2d 839 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Burns v. Herberger 498 P.2d 536 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Burns v. Herberger 498 P.2d 536 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Navajo County v. Four Corners Pipe Line Company 479 P.2d 174 Ariz. 1970
Navajo County v. Four Corners Pipe Line Company 479 P.2d 174 Ariz. 1970
However, the question of due process as far as taxation of companies, such as railroads and pipe-lines, has recently been answered by this Court in the *513 case of Apache County et al. v. Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company and Southern Pacific Company, decided by this Court on November 13, 1970, , .