Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Jerger v. Rubin, 471 P.2d 726.

54 citing documents.

Caruthers v. Underhill 326 P.3d 268 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Caruthers v. Underhill 326 P.3d 268 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
at 340 , 390 P.2d at 580-81 ; whether the party seeking rescission delayed in demanding rescission based on the other party’s reasonable assurances, , whether it is possible for the property sought to be returned by the defendant, , whether the party seeking rescission had actual or constructive knowledge of the fraud yet manifested to the other party an intention to affirm the transaction, , and whether there is evidence that the party se
League of Ariz. Cities and Towns v. Martin 201 P.3d 517 Ariz. 2009
League of Ariz. Cities and Towns v. Martin 201 P.3d 517 Ariz. 2009
( , ); Tovrea v. Umphress, 27 Ariz.App.
State ex rel. Department of Economic Security v. Vallejo 979 P.2d 529 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
State ex rel. Department of Economic Security v. Vallejo 979 P.2d 529 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Alaface v. National Investment Co. 892 P.2d 1375 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Alaface v. National Investment Co. 892 P.2d 1375 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
261 P. 969 (1928), , NIC became liable for Martin's misrepresentations when it ratified her statements by refusing to rescind the transaction upon demand by the Alafaces.
Marriage of Flynn v. Rogers 834 P.2d 148 Ariz. 1992
Marriage of Flynn v. Rogers 834 P.2d 148 Ariz. 1992
: Laches, a form of estoppel, is a defense where, because of delay or by lapse of time, the party asserting the defense either is injured (by the mere lapse of time) or changes his position in reliance on the other party’s inaction.
In re the Marriage of Flynn 812 P.2d 1087 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
In re the Marriage of Flynn 812 P.2d 1087 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
Appellee’s , is misplaced.
Centrust Mortgage Corp. v. PMI Mortgage Insurance 800 P.2d 37 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Centrust Mortgage Corp. v. PMI Mortgage Insurance 800 P.2d 37 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Miller v. Mason-McDuffie Co. 739 P.2d 803 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Miller v. Mason-McDuffie Co. 739 P.2d 803 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Restatement (Second) of Agency § 257 comment a (1957).
Colonial Villas, Inc. v. Title Insurance 703 P.2d 534 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Colonial Villas, Inc. v. Title Insurance 703 P.2d 534 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
United States Fire Insurance v. Gentile 712 P.2d 436 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
United States Fire Insurance v. Gentile 712 P.2d 436 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Pruitt v. Pavelin 685 P.2d 1347 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Pruitt v. Pavelin 685 P.2d 1347 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
477 , , , that cases allowing recovery against brokers for the misstatements of their salesmen share the following four elements in common: 1) The broker had a listing and presumably received a commission; 2) The salesman represented the seller and n
Arizona Laborers, Teamsters & Cement Masons Local 395 Health & Welfare Trust Fund v. Hatco, Inc. 690 P.2d 83 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Arizona Laborers, Teamsters & Cement Masons Local 395 Health & Welfare Trust Fund v. Hatco, Inc. 690 P.2d 83 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Appeal in Juvenile Action J-75482
Davis v. Tucson Arizona Boys Choir Society 669 P.2d 1005 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Davis v. Tucson Arizona Boys Choir Society 669 P.2d 1005 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Richter v. Dairy Queen of Southern Arizona, Inc. 643 P.2d 508 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
Richter v. Dairy Queen of Southern Arizona, Inc. 643 P.2d 508 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
Evans v. Valley Radiologists, Ltd. 619 P.2d 5 Ariz. 1980
Evans v. Valley Radiologists, Ltd. 619 P.2d 5 Ariz. 1980
Ahnert v. Sunnyside Unified School District 12 616 P.2d 933 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
Ahnert v. Sunnyside Unified School District 12 616 P.2d 933 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
Hueg v. SUNBURST FARMS (GLENDALE) MUT. WATER 594 P.2d 538 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Hueg v. SUNBURST FARMS (GLENDALE) MUT. WATER 594 P.2d 538 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
In Re Appeal In Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. J-75482
Trimble Cattle Co. v. Henry 592 P.2d 1310 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Trimble Cattle Co. v. Henry 592 P.2d 1310 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Gressley v. Patterson Tillage & Leveling Inc. 579 P.2d 1124 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Gressley v. Patterson Tillage & Leveling Inc. 579 P.2d 1124 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Parks v. American Cas. Co. of Reading, Pa. 572 P.2d 801 Ariz. 1977
Parks v. American Cas. Co. of Reading, Pa. 572 P.2d 801 Ariz. 1977
Connolly v. Great Basin Insurance Co., 6 Ariz.App.
Barnes v. Lopez 544 P.2d 694 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
Barnes v. Lopez 544 P.2d 694 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. J-75482 536 P.2d 197 Ariz. 1975
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. J-75482 536 P.2d 197 Ariz. 1975
Southern Pacific Company v. Loden 508 P.2d 347 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
Southern Pacific Company v. Loden 508 P.2d 347 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
Bates & Springer of Arizona, Inc. v. Friermood 507 P.2d 668 Ariz. 1973
Bates & Springer of Arizona, Inc. v. Friermood 507 P.2d 668 Ariz. 1973
Vivian Arnold Realty Co. v. McCormick 506 P.2d 1074 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
Vivian Arnold Realty Co. v. McCormick 506 P.2d 1074 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
Since an appellate court will not overturn the trial court’s judgment if there is any reasonable evidence to support it, , and finding such evidence, we affirm the order below voiding the deposit and receipt agreement and ordering the earnest money returned to appellees McCormick.