Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Spur Feeding Company v. Fernandez, 472 P.2d 12.

53 citing documents.

Rachelle Renee Westerman, Paul Bryan Westerman v. Timothy E. Ernst 563 P.3d 647 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
Rachelle Renee Westerman, Paul Bryan Westerman v. Timothy E. Ernst 563 P.3d 647 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
except to neither willfully nor intentionally inflict an injury.” (trespasser generally may not recover unless landowner “has been guilty of some willful or wanton disregard for the plaintiff’s safety”); Nicoletti, 131 Ariz. at 142 (defining a trespasser as a “person who enters or remains upon land in the possess
Matthew Cavallo v. Phoenix Health Plans Inc Ariz. 2022
Matthew Cavallo v. Phoenix Health Plans Inc Ariz. 2022
Co., (“We agree that it is reversible error to instruct upon a theory which is not supported by facts to be found in the record .
Lane v. Gavilan Peak Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Lane v. Gavilan Peak Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Landowners have an affirmative duty to use reasonable care to make the premises safe for an invitee’s use, but a landowner owes no duty to trespassers other than to refrain from willfully or intentionally injuring them
Quintiliani v. Concentric Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Quintiliani v. Concentric Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Soto v. Sacco 372 P.3d 1040 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Soto v. Sacco 372 P.3d 1040 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
¶13 We turn then to the determination that Michael’s award was “excessive and not supported by the evidence.” It has “long been the rule in this jurisdiction that the exercise of the power of remittitur rests in the sound discretion of the court.”
State v. Speers 98 P.3d 560 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
State v. Speers 98 P.3d 560 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
¶ 27 A trial court commits reversible error when it instructs on an issue or theory that is not supported by evidence because it “invites the jury to speculate as to possible non-existent circumstances.” , ( , ).
Armenta v. City of Casa Grande 71 P.3d 359 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
Armenta v. City of Casa Grande 71 P.3d 359 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
Schmitz v. Aston 3 P.3d 1184 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Schmitz v. Aston 3 P.3d 1184 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
State v. Cutright 2 P.3d 657 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
State v. Cutright 2 P.3d 657 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Although ordinarily instructing on a legal principle for which there is no evidentiary support is error because it "invites the jury to speculate,” , our supreme court has taken a different approach when the flight instruction is involved.
City of Phoenix v. Clauss 869 P.2d 1219 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
City of Phoenix v. Clauss 869 P.2d 1219 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Salt River Valley Water Users' Ass'n v. Superior Court 870 P.2d 1166 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Newman v. Sun Valley Crushing Co. 844 P.2d 623 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Newman v. Sun Valley Crushing Co. 844 P.2d 623 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Rhue v. Dawson 841 P.2d 215 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Rhue v. Dawson 841 P.2d 215 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Herman v. Sedor 812 P.2d 629 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
Herman v. Sedor 812 P.2d 629 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
Kauffman v. Schroeder, supra; , Ong v. Pepsi Cola Metropolitan Bottling Co., 18 Ariz.App.
Brown v. Arizona Public Service Co. 790 P.2d 290 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Brown v. Arizona Public Service Co. 790 P.2d 290 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
3 See Spur Feeding Co. *10 v. Fernandez, , Clarke v. Edging, 20 Ariz.App.
Moore v. Tucson Electric Power Co. 761 P.2d 1091 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Moore v. Tucson Electric Power Co. 761 P.2d 1091 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Bell v. Maricopa Medical Center 755 P.2d 1180 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Bell v. Maricopa Medical Center 755 P.2d 1180 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints v. Superior Court 714 P.2d 431 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints v. Superior Court 714 P.2d 431 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
W. Prosser Law of Torts at 364 (4th Ed.1971).
Custom Roofing Co., Inc. v. Alling 706 P.2d 400 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Custom Roofing Co., Inc. v. Alling 706 P.2d 400 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Torres v. North American Van Lines, Inc. 658 P.2d 835 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
Torres v. North American Van Lines, Inc. 658 P.2d 835 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
Payne v. M. Greenberg Construction 636 P.2d 116 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Payne v. M. Greenberg Construction 636 P.2d 116 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
E. g., , Shannon v. Butler Homes, Inc., , Barry v. Southern Pac.
Carlson v. Tucson Racquet & Swim Club, Inc. 619 P.2d 756 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
Carlson v. Tucson Racquet & Swim Club, Inc. 619 P.2d 756 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
Barnhizer v. Paradise Valley Unified School District 69 599 P.2d 209 Ariz. 1979
Barnhizer v. Paradise Valley Unified School District 69 599 P.2d 209 Ariz. 1979
Prosser on Torts, 4th Ed. at 364; 2 Harper and James § 27.5.
Brierley v. Anaconda Company 522 P.2d 1085 Ariz. 1974
Brierley v. Anaconda Company 522 P.2d 1085 Ariz. 1974
reversed on other grounds, , and it is reversible error to instruct on a theory which is not supported by the facts since the court thereby invites the jury to speculate as to possible non-existent circumstances, , , 49 A.L.R.
Clarke v. Edging 512 P.2d 30 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
Clarke v. Edging 512 P.2d 30 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
495 , , and Giacona v. Tapley, 5 Ariz.App.
Ong v. Pepsi Cola Metropolitan Bottling Co. 503 P.2d 415 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972