Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Mach, 19 P.3d 613.

15 citing documents.

Adrian Gilbert Dominguez v. Hon. Metcalf 531 P.3d 372 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2023
First, “[a] finding of guilty-except-insane is not a criminal conviction.”
State v. Esposito Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Giardini Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Yug 501 P.3d 246 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
DISCUSSION ¶4 We review the superior court’s ruling on presentence incarceration credit de novo, ¶ 5 (App. 2001), and will not disturb the court’s sentencing order absent a clear abuse of discretion, ¶ 5 (App. 2001).
In Re Fredrick B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
2d at 33, ¶ 53 (holding that delayed review of SVP’s status under Wisconsin’s sexually violent persons statutes does not justify SVP’s discharge when he “continues to be a sexually violent person, [because] the cost to the public of releasing him into society would simply be too high and would be contrary to [the statutes’] treatment objective”); -79, ¶ 23 (App. 2001) (holding, in case of commitment of guilty-except-insane person under A.R.S.
State v. Garcia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶ 9 (App. 2017) ( ¶ 5 (App. 2001)).
State v. Price Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Gonzalez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
A trial court’s failure to credit a defendant with the appropriate length of presentence custody constitutes fundamental error, and this Court reviews de novo a grant of presentence incarceration credit, ¶ 5
State v. Gallentine Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
A trial court’s failure to credit a defendant with the appropriate length of presentence custody constitutes fundamental error, and this court reviews de novo a grant of presentence incarceration credit, ¶ 5
State v. Randles 334 P.3d 730 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶ 5, ¶ 7, (constitutionality of statutes reviewed de novo); ¶ 6, (same).
State v. Urquidez 138 P.3d 1177 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Robinson v. Hotham 118 P.3d 1129 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
State v. Givens 76 P.3d 457 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
State v. McMahon 38 P.3d 1213 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
In Re John M. 36 P.3d 772 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001