Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Cropper, 68 P.3d 407.

64 citing documents.

State of Arizona v. Billie Marie Fornof Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
State of Arizona v. Billie Marie Fornof Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
supp. op., 206 Ariz. 153
State v. Brown 177 P.3d 878 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
State v. Brown 177 P.3d 878 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
State of Arizona v. Lance Christian Hamblin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
State of Arizona v. Lance Christian Hamblin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Factual and Procedural Background ¶2 On appeal, “[w]e view the facts in the light most favorable to sustaining the verdict[s].”
State v. Cheramie 171 P.3d 1253 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
State v. Cheramie 171 P.3d 1253 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
State of Arizona v. Jill Irene Paris-Sheldon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
State of Arizona v. Jill Irene Paris-Sheldon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Factual and Procedural Background ¶2 On appeal, “[w]e view the facts in the light most favorable to sustaining the verdict[s].”
State v. Ellison 140 P.3d 899 Ariz. 2006
State v. Ellison 140 P.3d 899 Ariz. 2006
State v. Chiappetta 107 P.3d 366 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
State v. Chiappetta 107 P.3d 366 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
"A party challenging a trial judge's impartiality must overcome a strong presumption that trial judges are "`free of bias and prejudice.'" "