Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Davis, 79 P.3d 64.

114 citing documents.

State of Arizona v. Jay David Ramsey, Sr. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
State of Arizona v. Jay David Ramsey, Sr. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
1 See also Wong Tai v. United States, 273 U.S. 77, 80-81, 47 S. Ct. 300, 301, 71 L. Ed. 545, 547 (1927) (valid indictment “shall advise the defendant of the nature and cause of the accusation in order that he may meet it and prepare for trial, and after judgment, be able to plead the record and judgment in bar of a further prosecution for the same offense”); (defendant has fundamental right to reasonable notice of specific charge); State v. O’Brien, (duplicitous charges prohibited in order to gi
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office v. Maricopa County Employee Merit System Commission 119 P.3d 1022 Ariz. 2005
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office v. Maricopa County Employee Merit System Commission 119 P.3d 1022 Ariz. 2005
gard for facts and circumstances; where there is room for two opinions, the action is not arbitrary or capricious if exercised honestly and upon due consideration, even _____________________________ within a permitted statutory range will only be exercised in a “rare” case and that “we had not seen such a case in years”) (overruled in part on other grounds, ).
State v. Anderson 111 P.3d 369 Ariz. 2005
State v. Anderson 111 P.3d 369 Ariz. 2005
State v. Carreon 107 P.3d 900 Ariz. 2005
State v. Carreon 107 P.3d 900 Ariz. 2005
State v. Berger 103 P.3d 298 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
State v. Berger 103 P.3d 298 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
He was neither immature nor of a subnormal level of intelligence unlike the defendants in Davis, , , 8 and State v. Bartlett (Bartlett II), 9 , , 10 cert.
State v. Long 83 P.3d 618 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Followed State v. Long 83 P.3d 618 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
State v. Monaco 83 P.3d 553 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
State v. Monaco 83 P.3d 553 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004