Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Cromwell, 119 P.3d 448.
- State v. Barragan-Sierra 196 P.3d 879 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
-
State v. Barragan-Sierra
196 P.3d 879
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
¶ 38 , (citing the principle that, whenever possible, we construe statutes to uphold their constitutionality).
- State v. Boggs 185 P.3d 111 Ariz. 2008
-
State v. Boggs
185 P.3d 111
Ariz. 2008
-90 ¶¶ 39-45, -57 (2005).
- State v. Pandeli 161 P.3d 557 Ariz. 2007
-
Overruled
State v. Pandeli
161 P.3d 557
Ariz. 2007
- 10 - -89, ¶¶ 40-42, -56 (2005), cert.
- State v. Andriano 161 P.3d 540 Ariz. 2007
-
State v. Andriano
161 P.3d 540
Ariz. 2007
-89, ¶¶ 40-42, - 56 (2005), cert.
- State v. Garza 163 P.3d 1006 Ariz. 2007
-
State v. Garza
163 P.3d 1006
Ariz. 2007
31 determine whether death is the appropriate penalty.17 ¶¶ 52-53, cert.
- State v. Morris 160 P.3d 203 Ariz. 2007
-
State v. Morris
160 P.3d 203
Ariz. 2007
-90 ¶¶ 38-45, -57 (2005), cert.
- State v. Tucker 160 P.3d 177 Ariz. 2007
-
State v. Tucker
160 P.3d 177
Ariz. 2007
E.g., Ellison, 213 Ariz. at 139 ¶¶ 98-99, 140 P.3d at 922; ¶ 42, cert.
- State v. Smith 159 P.3d 531 Ariz. 2007
- State v. Smith 159 P.3d 531 Ariz. 2007
- State Ex Rel. Thomas v. Rayes 153 P.3d 1040 Ariz. 2007
-
State Ex Rel. Thomas v. Rayes
153 P.3d 1040
Ariz. 2007
-88 ¶¶ 27-37, -55 (2005) (discussing criteria for replacement of appointed counsel).
- State v. McGill 140 P.3d 930 Ariz. 2006
-
State v. McGill
140 P.3d 930
Ariz. 2006
188-90 ¶¶ 38-45, -57 (2005).
- State v. Gomez 123 P.3d 1131 Ariz. 2005
- State v. Gomez 123 P.3d 1131 Ariz. 2005