Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Ellison, 140 P.3d 899.

406 citing documents.

State of Arizona v. Jason Eugene Bush 423 P.3d 370 Ariz. 2018
State v. Ellison , , 127 ¶ 30, , 910 (2006).
State v. Winiker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Winiker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Torres Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Torres Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Edwards Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Edwards Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 25 (2006) (citation omitted).
State v. Jacobson 418 P.3d 960 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Jacobson 418 P.3d 960 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Ellison , , 129, ¶ 42, , 912 (2006) (citing Lilly v. Virginia , 527 U.S. 116 , 137, 119 S.Ct.
State v. Ribble Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Ribble Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
We review evidentiary rulings that implicate a defendant’s constitutional rights de novo, ¶ 42 (2006), considering only the evidence submitted at the suppression hearing.
State of Arizona v. Jasper Phillip Rushing Ariz. 2017
State of Arizona v. Jasper Phillip Rushing Ariz. 2017
State v. Molinar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Molinar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Schmitt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Schmitt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Billups Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Billups Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Stoneham Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Stoneham Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Stelmasek Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Stelmasek Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Farr Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Farr Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Azar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Azar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. McClain Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. McClain Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Belvin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Belvin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶ 43 (2008) ( ¶ 25 (2006)).
State v. Blanchard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Blanchard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Deng Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Deng Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Nevertheless, “[t]o be admissible, [Deng’s] statement must be voluntary, not obtained by coercion or improper inducement.” ¶ 30 (2006); A.R.S.
State v. Begay Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Begay Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶ 42 (2006) (holding that evidentiary rulings by the trial court are generally reviewed for an abuse of discretion.)
State v. Tracy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Wilson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Tracy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Wilson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Ortiz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Ortiz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
¶ 69 (2006), holding that “we now decline to recognize duress as a defense to accomplice liability for murder .
State v. Stewart Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Stewart Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
¶ 42 (2006) ( ¶ 41 (2003)).
State v. Peterson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Peterson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by