Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Stroud, 103 P.3d 912.

163 citing documents.

State of Arizona v. Lance Christian Hamblin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
State v. Cox 174 P.3d 265 Ariz. 2007
State v. Cox 174 P.3d 265 Ariz. 2007
Substantial evidence is evidence that “reasonable persons could accept as sufficient to support a guilty verdict beyond a reasonable doubt.” -13, ¶ 6, -15 (2005) ( ).
State v. Sharma 165 P.3d 693 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
State v. Sharma 165 P.3d 693 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
State of Arizona v. Gary Edward Cox Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
State of Arizona v. Gary Edward Cox Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
State v. Nelson 150 P.3d 769 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
State v. Nelson 150 P.3d 769 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
In re Brittany Y. 147 P.3d 1047 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
In re Brittany Y. 147 P.3d 1047 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
“ ‘Restraint’ is not defined by statute, but the common understanding of the word connotes controlling, limiting, or restricting the movement of another.” ¶ 9
State v. Febles 115 P.3d 629 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
State v. Febles 115 P.3d 629 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005