Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Velazquez, 166 P.3d 91.

84 citing documents.

State of Arizona v. Dale Shawn Hausner 280 P.3d 604 Ariz. 2012
State of Arizona v. Dale Shawn Hausner 280 P.3d 604 Ariz. 2012
State v. Bonfiglio 266 P.3d 375 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
State v. Bonfiglio 266 P.3d 375 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
¶ 11 We “will reverse a conviction for prosecutorial misconduct if (1) misconduct is indeed present; and (2) a reasonable likelihood exists that the misconduct could have affected the jury’s verdict, thereby denying [the] defendant a fair trial.” ¶ 34 , ( ¶ 45 , ).
State of Arizona v. Jahmari Ali Manuel 270 P.3d 828 Ariz. 2011
State of Arizona v. Jahmari Ali Manuel 270 P.3d 828 Ariz. 2011
“[I]t is improper [for a prosecutor] to imply unethical conduct 11 on the part of an expert witness in the absence of evidentiary support.” ¶ 48, (quoting Hughes, 193 Ariz. at 86 ¶ 59, 969 P.2d at 1198).
State v. Prince 250 P.3d 1145 Ariz. 2011
State v. Dixon 250 P.3d 1174 Ariz. 2011
State v. Dixon 250 P.3d 1174 Ariz. 2011
ard of review ¶7 A defendant seeking reversal of a conviction for prosecutorial misconduct must establish that “(1) misconduct is indeed present; and (2) a reasonable likelihood exists that the misconduct could have affected the jury’s verdict, thereby denying [the] defendant a fair trial.” ¶ 45, (alteration in original) (internal quotation marks omitted).
State v. Prince 250 P.3d 1145 Ariz. 2011
age, can establish two aggravating factors, that fact cannot be “weighed ‘twice in balancing aggravating and mitigating circumstances.’” Chappell, 225 Ariz. at 241 ¶ 48, 236 P.3d at 1188 ( ¶ 21, ).
State v. Gallardo 242 P.3d 159 Ariz. 2010
State v. Gallardo 242 P.3d 159 Ariz. 2010
¶34 We “will reverse a conviction for prosecutorial misconduct if (1) misconduct is indeed present; and (2) a reasonable likelihood exists that the misconduct could have affected the jury’s verdict, thereby denying [the] defendant a fair trial.” ¶ 45, (alteration in original) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).
State v. Don Chappell 236 P.3d 1176 Ariz. 2010
State v. Don Chappell 236 P.3d 1176 Ariz. 2010
¶27 The jury instructions given here are materially identical to instructions approved in our previous cases.6 See, ¶¶ 28-29, The jury was instructed as follows: All first degree murders are to some extent cruel.
State v. Womble 235 P.3d 244 Ariz. 2010
State v. Womble 235 P.3d 244 Ariz. 2010
also ‘[a defendant’s] level of intelligence, maturity, past experience, and level of participation in the killings.’” ¶ 68, ( ¶ 37, ).
State v. Villalobos 235 P.3d 227 Ariz. 2010
State v. Villalobos 235 P.3d 227 Ariz. 2010
State v. Cropper 225 P.3d 579 Ariz. 2010
State v. Cropper 225 P.3d 579 Ariz. 2010
State v. KUHS 224 P.3d 192 Ariz. 2010
State v. KUHS 224 P.3d 192 Ariz. 2010
State v. Speer 212 P.3d 787 Ariz. 2009
State v. Speer 212 P.3d 787 Ariz. 2009
“A defendant is entitled to ‘a fair trial by a panel of impartial, indifferent jurors.’” -07 ¶ 18, -98 (2007) (quoting Morgan v. Illinois, 504 U.S. 719, 727 (1992)).
State v. Dann 207 P.3d 604 Ariz. 2009
State v. Dann 207 P.3d 604 Ariz. 2009
State v. Bocharski 189 P.3d 403 Ariz. 2008
State v. Bocharski 189 P.3d 403 Ariz. 2008
State v. Armstrong 189 P.3d 378 Ariz. 2008
State v. Armstrong 189 P.3d 378 Ariz. 2008
C. Propriety of death sentence ¶82 “In reviewing the propriety of the death sentence, ‘we consider the quality and the strength, not simply the number, of aggravating and mitigating factors.’” State v. Velazquez, 216 ¶ 75, (quoting Glassel, 211 Ariz. at 55 ¶ 93, 116 P.3d at 1215).
State v. Martinez 189 P.3d 348 Ariz. 2008
State v. Martinez 189 P.3d 348 Ariz. 2008
This Court will reverse a conviction for prosecutorial misconduct only when “(1) misconduct is indeed present; and (2) a reasonable likelihood exists that the misconduct could have affected the jury’s verdict, thereby denying [the] defendant a fair trial.” ¶ 45, cert.
State v. McCray 183 P.3d 503 Ariz. 2008
State v. McCray 183 P.3d 503 Ariz. 2008
-15 ¶ 73, -06 (2007); Newell, 212 Ariz. at 406 ¶¶ 86-87, 132 P.3d at 850.