Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Wall, 126 P.3d 148.

214 citing documents.

State of Arizona v. Alejandro Chaparro Romero Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
State of Arizona v. Alejandro Chaparro Romero Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
constitute an abuse of discretion,”
State v. Andriano 161 P.3d 540 Ariz. 2007
State v. Andriano 161 P.3d 540 Ariz. 2007
acts of domestic violence.” ¶36 We held in State v. Celaya that “where the sole defense is self-defense so that the evidence requires either conviction or acquittal, any instruction on any other grade would be impermissible.” ¶ 29, (noting that when defendant asserts an “all-or- nothing” defense, the record usually will not support the giving of a lesser-included offense instruction); State v. Jones, 109 Ariz. 80, 81-82, -53 (1973) (holding that lesser
State of Arizona v. Rachel Marie Vallejo 158 P.3d 916 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
State of Arizona v. Rachel Marie Vallejo 158 P.3d 916 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
“An error of law committed in reaching a discretionary conclusion may, however, constitute an abuse of discretion.”
State of Arizona v. Cynthia D. Johnson 156 P.3d 445 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
State of Arizona v. Cynthia D. Johnson 156 P.3d 445 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
¶15 Although Johnson has not cited them, we find three supreme court cases dispositive of her appeal: P.3d 148 (2006); P.3d 1114 (2002); P.3d 1048 (2002).
State of Arizona v. Cesar Francisco Rubiano 150 P.3d 271 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
State of Arizona v. Cesar Francisco Rubiano 150 P.3d 271 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Stoudamire v. State of Arizona 141 P.3d 776 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Stoudamire v. State of Arizona 141 P.3d 776 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
State of Arizona v. James Albert Robles Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
State of Arizona v. James Albert Robles Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
“An error of law committed in reaching a discretionary conclusion may, however, constitute an abuse of discretion.”