Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Armstrong, 189 P.3d 378.

58 citing documents.

State v. Kiles 213 P.3d 174 Ariz. 2009
State v. Kiles 213 P.3d 174 Ariz. 2009
is far removed from the crime.” -66, ¶ 79, -93 (2008).
State v. Moore 213 P.3d 150 Ariz. 2009
State v. Moore 213 P.3d 150 Ariz. 2009
35 ¶86 To prove the (F)(8) aggravator, the State must establish beyond a reasonable doubt that the murders took place during a “continuous course of criminal conduct” and were “temporally, spatially, and motivationally related.” State v. Armstrong (Armstrong III), ¶ 67
State v. Dann 207 P.3d 604 Ariz. 2009
State v. Dann 207 P.3d 604 Ariz. 2009
See, e.g., State v. Armstrong (Armstrong II), 218 Ariz. 451, 466 ¶ 80, Pandeli III, 215 Ariz. at 533 ¶ 82, 161 P.3d at 576.
State v. Peek 195 P.3d 641 Ariz. 2008
State v. Peek 195 P.3d 641 Ariz. 2008
State v. Armstrong, 218 Ariz. 451, 463, ¶ 54